Posted by | March 9, 2008 20:35 | Filed under: Top Stories

From: Paul
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 4:03 PM
To: Alan
Subject: Hillary ClintonDear Alan,Hear are a few facts of which I hope you can get accross to the public…If you take all of the demorcratic primaries and put a winner takes all you would have the following Hillary Clinton 1,504 delgates Barack Obama 909 he has 14 victories while she has 13. So I guess the main question is do you want a candiate that can win the big states come Nov or are you happy winning states like Kansas and Utah that you have no chance of winning in Nov…

From: Marvin
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 4:12 PM
To: Alan
Subject: HILLARY,MCCAIN GET BUSH 3AM CALL

Mc Cain is all about the war. He wanted to use the war to become the president of the United States, lets not mention the war he supported. This war is here; now I ask John; IF Saddam Hussein was still in power do you think Iraq could be in the critical state it’s in today? IF Saddam was still in power America troops wouldn’t have to sacrifice their freedom and life. IF Saddam was still in power American troops would be on American soil protecting our nation E.G. Protecting and Securing our borders. John Mc Cain only knows ONE word, because that’s all I hear. WAR!…America is supposed to help other nations NOT take over other countries, not dictating on how their way of life is supposed to be. Why do America leaders insist on mimicking our way of life on others?… THANKS,MARVIN

From: Ray
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:23 AM
To: Alan
Subject: bias

ALAN,

OFTEN YOU ARE JUST PLAIN BIASED AGAINST ANYTHING WHICH FEELS, SOUNDS OR OFFICIALLY IS CONSERVATIVE. WHY DO YOU ACT THIS WAY? THIS SHOW IS SUPPOSED TO BE “FAIR AND BALANCED”, BUT, YOU JUST ARE NOT BALANCED.

YOU REMIND ME OF MY DAD WHO, AFTER GRADUATING WITH A LAW DEGREE FROM UNIV. OF HOUSTON, WAS THE MOST ANTI-CONSERVATIVE I EVER KNEW. FROM ONE WHO ONCE PROFESSED BELIEF IN THE FAIRNESS OF A TWO PARTY SYSTEM..HE BECAME ONE WHO STRONGLY WAS LIBERAL. I SUPPOSE HE BECAME THIS WAY BECAUSE OF THOSE WHO “PROFESSED”

LIBERALISM IN THE WAYS THEY HELD SWAY IN CLASSES.

YOUR WAY OF DICUSSING THINGS IS TO CUT-IN, DISTORT AND BULLY THOSE WITH OPPOSING VIEWS FROM YOURS. HAVEN’T YOU NOTICED YET, THERE ARE MORE VIEWS THAN YOURS?

WAKE UP AND COME ON IN, THE AIR IS WARM AND THERE’S A DOUGHNUT WAITING FOR YOU.

I GOTTA LOVE YOU FOR PUTTING YOURSELF INTO THIS ARENA, THOUGH.

RAY IN TENNESSEE

From: Alan
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:32 AM
To: Ray
Subject: RE: bias

Sean tends to be against that which is liberal. I am that way with conservatives. That is why our show is fair and balanced.

From: Ray
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 5:31 PM
To: Alan
Subject: RE: bias

WELL, THANKS FOR SENDING YOUR RESPONSE. I MUST ADMIT YOU DID REPLY. EVEN MANY SENATORS/CONGRESSMEN DON’T EVEN TAKE TIME TO SEND A REPLY.

GOOD FOR YOU! I KEEP WATCHING. RAY IN TENNESSEE

From: Mike
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 6:56 PM
To: Alan
Subject: Dick Morris/Karl Rove

Hi Alan.

You’ve had Dick Morris on your show and Karl Rove on your show.

But they always appear in separate segments.

These are arguably the most brilliant political minds in the country.

Why not have them on the screen together?

It would be VERY interesting.

Would they agree on everything?

Or would they disagree, and on what?

Please do a segment with both Dick Morris and Karl Rove on the screen at the same time.

Sincerely,

Mike

From: Alan
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 9:26 PM
To: Mike
Subject: RE: Dick Morris/Karl Rove

We couldn’t do that. That would disprove that they’re the same person.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2008 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.