On Tuesday’s Radio Show…
June 24th, 2008, 6:00 PM EDT
• Imus Under Fire: We’ll debate the furor surrounding the radio host’s recent controversial comments.
• Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan responds to the latest Republican attacks on his tell-all book, What Happened.
• Bestselling author Dick Morris talks about his new book, Fleeced.
• Alan discusses today’s hottest issues with wrestling legend and former Governor Jesse Ventura, author of Don’t Start the Revolution Without Me!
Jesse’s a tool.
June 24th, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Don’t start the revolution without TRIPARTISAN politics!
June 24th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Flap~ what’s this about “tripartisan” politics? We live under a government dominated by one political party, c/o lobbyists and the corporations/groups they represent.
Alan~ I did some promoting for you tonight at a dinner with some of my neighbors. You’ll need to send me a check for that. And don’t forget to send Flap’s check to me. As aforementioned, I’ll make sure he gets it. :-D
June 24th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Alan Colmes also adamantly refuses to acknowledge the hundreds (and soon to be thousands) of PROFESSIONAL architects and engineers who have openly questioned the official version of 9/11. He’ll have on phony psychics, religious loons (God hates fags) and people who claim to talk to animals but he won’t have a guest on to SERIOUSLY discuss alternative theories of 9/11? What does that tell you about his priorities and motives?
Click here to learn about the information that the establishment elite are terrified of.
http://www.ae911truth.org/
Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!
Mission Statement:
To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 “collapses” of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings to every architect and engineer
Also see the following websites if you’re tired of being lied to and treated like a child by the complicit, corporate controlled establishment media.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
When Colmes and others mock and attack the 9/11 truth movement they’re really just playing right in to the psychological profile of the opposition as the great Ghandi had once described it so eloquently.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
It’s so predictable.
The people have finally peered behind the curtain and now there’s no turning back! As for the rest of you sheeple, keep grazing in the fields of ignorance. You’ll never learn because you enjoy being lied to.
June 24th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
my patience with the Twitter stuff wears thin. I hope we get to know how it works with the site soon.
June 24th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
“911 truth” What are you idiots talking about? Everyone in the country saw the planes fly into the towers. I don’t get it. The planes were a cover for explosives? It’s so ignorant a view. How could anyone take you seriously? What flavor is the koolaid Buru?
June 24th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Oh please! Anything linked to Alex Jones has no creditability. That idiot needs to be locked up put in a mental asylum. Quit listening to such idiots as George Noorey. Damned conspiracy jackasses.
It 7 years too damned late to be calling 911 a conspiracy..BS.
June 24th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
Alan:
It is not that you called McK “old” it is that you said the earth was cooling…. it’s WARMING remember!!! That is the issue…..
Rod
June 24th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
McC — that is meant to be…..!! (I am so funny I cannot spell).
June 24th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Alan Colmes- why are you “bored” by the woman who calls in about 9/11? The fall of Building 7 and the amount of damage done to the Pentagon IS suspicious. For real, man. It is.
June 25th, 2008 at 12:20 am
Wow Cheryl. Buliding 7 got weakened by the two towers collapsing. Where is the conspiracy?
June 25th, 2008 at 12:31 am
Oh and the Pentagon had a plane fly into it…
June 25th, 2008 at 12:32 am
Bldg 7 was too far away for that to happen. The speed that the plane was flying at shouldn’t have caused the amount of damage it did. The fire burned too hot, too.
Anyway, I’m not a big supporter of the 9/11 conspiracy theory- but I do find these issues suspicious.
June 25th, 2008 at 12:36 am
The fact that a “fetus” is a “baby” is not a religious view, it’s a COMMON SENSE view.
If your wife was pregnant and miscarried at 2 months, would you be grieving for the “fetus”? Or your baby?
June 25th, 2008 at 12:39 am
Tripartisan politics was in the Minnesota legislature, I believe. I just remember Ventura seeming to say that all the time.
I can’t believe I agree with Fury, but I do.
June 25th, 2008 at 12:40 am
CHERYL, DITTO!
June 25th, 2008 at 12:40 am
Legal is irrelevant! What is REALITY? It’s not a religious view, it’s a HUMAN RIGHTS view.
At 24 weeks babies can survive outside the womb, Alan! It ain’t religious at that point!
June 25th, 2008 at 12:42 am
the heart starts beating at FIVE WEEKS. the HEART.
June 25th, 2008 at 12:48 am
Radio Graffiti was great tonight…
I’d like to slap Nancy Pelosi upside the head.
Does it make you feel good to hang up on people?
The guy who said Alan was a klan member was Mike in Alexandria… the guy who said he lives in a $10,000 house and drives a $100,000 car… and who said that he’s spent thousands of dollars on prostitutes bc they do things for him his wife wouldn’t do… and who called in and said he has a brand new yacht… and who’s always emphasizing how much money he has.
I didn’t think they let patients in mental institutions make outbound calls.
June 25th, 2008 at 12:59 am
Actually I’m kind of bored by the 9/11 conspiracy thing too, because it sounds so much like the Pearl Harbor conspiracy thing.
Like it’s just beyond imagining that an attack like 9/11 could be so far beyond the imagination of anyone in our government that nothing was done to prepare for the eventuality.
Frankly, I think it all stems from a desperate need in each of us to imagine that we know better than everyone else.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:48 am
Dr. James Dobson should focus on true religious freedom; the freedom to believe any form of faith you so choose. That is the real religious foundation of the USA. He parades around on radio proclaiming he knows the real interpretation of the Bible. This is fine for his personal religious freedom but an insult to other people’s religious freedom. Dr. Dobson has a fruit loop interpretation of what the constitution is very clear about. There shall be no religious test of any public office, not even the Office of the President. His 06-24-08-radio broadcast amounted to a religious test for Office. Possibly, he did not read that part of the constitution. What is even worse is his claim that he stands for free speech and the freedom of religion, while damning Obama for his free speech and religion. Dr. Dobson claims to know how all Americans should perceive the Bible. That is not religious freedom; that is actually religious fascism, absolutism, or religious authoritarianism. Dr. Dobson does not believe in T. Jefferson’s description of the “wall of separation” between the Church and State he wrote into the First Amendment with his push for government and religion to marry in an unholy alliance. Dobson has no creditability to claim that he knows who is or is not a good possible President due to the fact that he assisted George W. Bush win two elections. President Bush and his Administration have ignored the constitution, its amendments and the principle of the separation of powers (Congressional and Judicial Review or Oversight). Dr. Dobson should stick to the family and apologize to the nation for his role in the Bush Presidency with all its failures, bad judgment, and mismanagement of our Laws, our government, our Liberty and the disservice to his Oath of Office.
June 25th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Dr. Dobson would have us believe that all law and morals originate strictly from the Old or New Testament. What did people do before the Bible? There were people on Earth long before the Bible. They had systems of government, family structure, family values, tribal norms, cultural norms and they had morals. What! They had morals? No way! Yes. I know it sounds hard to believe but the Bible is not the originator of morals. Common sense is. Basic human compassion is the true source of our morals. The concern for relatives, children, and those near to our emotions drive the human conscience. Thus it is this tight group association from our past that created morals or ethics, which enabled our ancient ancestors to survive unforgiving predators, climates, and competing tribes or groups of people. Emotions are the root of morals (love, concern, sympathy, etc) Emotions like hate, jealousy, vengeance, etc. are the root of what Dr. Dobson would call Evil. Even the lack of emotion is a factor in actions we call evil. With no emotion any Evil act is possible by mentally unstable or deranged individuals. We as a species had emotion and a conscience long before the Old and New Testament. Dare I say, morals evolved. Did the Native Americans have a complex governmental system? Yes, they had tribal councils with elders who would deal with the societal issues of individuals or the tribe as a whole. They were unaware of the Bible yet many of the Native Americans were peaceful, loving, respectful peoples. They rarely had to deal with murder, stealing, and many of the other issues which plaque modern civilizations that used the Bible as a moral guide. The Native Americans would punish thieves, murders, and other social deviants. They had as many morals as any Christian population, yet with no Bible in sight. If you require a book in order for you to be good, that is fine. I would rather people act in a moral manner out of common sense and logic of their own choice; for it would mean more than some one who needs the fear of punishment to behave. The fact that many civilizations prior to the existence of the Bible had systems for dealing with social misbehavior, crime, or disobedience (China, Native Americans, Japan, Persia, Pre-Christian Rome, Greek, Pre-Christian Celtic, or Egyptian) is historical proof that morals pre-date Judea-Christian Texts. Dr Dobson proves not that he is more moral than others. Dobson proves that he is not aware of History and in his ignorance he believes that the Bible is the sole origin of morals while negating the morals of Native Americans and cultures that are much older than Christianity. Dr. Dobson displays his cultural arrogance by his assertion of the origin of morality.
June 25th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Wow, my comments were deleted. Way to go Colmes.
June 26th, 2008 at 7:04 pm