• A close look at the war of words between John Kerry and John McCain.
• Mark Krikorian, author of The New Case Against Immigration, explains why he wants to stop ALL immigrants from entering America – including those with legal status.
• Are humans an overrated species? Alan analyzes the wisdom of those who prefer pets to people.
RC,
What do you mean “we” white man? As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger as they were surrounded by Indians.
Robert Hume
RC: Actually opening the doors with an immigration policy based on Multiculturalism is the program designed with our extinction… you’re importing cultures that intend on replacing the decling one.
That is exactly what is happening in Europe.. in each nation, the native culture is self-destructing and a rapidly growing hostile culture is in its midst waiting for the calender to assure its ascendency.
If we have an immigration policy which mandates an Americanization of newcomers (and it actually worked) , then by all means.. if you’re not a deadbeat, come to America.
Multiculturalism is the Suicide for the West.
Pluralism is what I advocate.
The Census Bureau says that the population of the US is currently reproducing at a rate of about 1800 births per 2000 women, which is not even “replacement rate.”
So closing our doors to all immigrants would appear to be a program ending with our extinction.
The recent API (American Petroleum Institute) advertising campaign has stated that the USA has enough energy supplies to last for 60 years. That sounds great, at first. This lame public relations operation is slick deception. This deceptions goal is the subversion of resources that hold a greater value than any oil or gas. The food supply that is generated by coastal areas is worth more than 60 odd years of energy. The tourism aspect of coastal areas is worth more than the energy and food supply combined. I ask, is it worth jeopardizing the purity of the coastal areas for a small supply of oil? Consider the way energy is being consumed. Consider the rate of demand and the continuing rise of price. Even if we have 60 years of supply in the US, within 30 years the price will still be sky high due to peak energy supplies and growing international demand. Oil or energy is traded internationally. We would have to have Congress pass legislation for all oil to remain within the boarder of the USA. People seem to forget this and API never mentions it in their advertisements. They only want to shape our opinion so that they can skirt environmental protections, which in reality protect local economic foundations like fishing and tourism. The American Petroleum Institute should tell their viewers that even if they had access to drill where they wished, there would not be any immediate relief in price at the pump for years. People seem to think that there would be an immediate relief if we open up Alaska’s ANWAR. This is not the reality. People do not realize that even if Iraq were at full production, plus OPEC increases in output, and an increase in Alaska’s oil drilling the price on the world market would not move below 100 dollars per barrel. Why? Geo-Political Factors, the Value of the Dollar, Future increase in Demand, and Peak Oil Realities. With 60 years of domestic oil and natural gas there will still be outlandish prices for which consumers will have to deal with. Oil is a dead end energy source. The only way to free ourselves from foreign oil is to free ourselves from oil entirely. We must investigate if the energy companies have shelved renewable energy patents. We must investigate energy that is renewable, cheap, clean, and put it in the hands of all who require it. There is too much to loose if people can be energy independent, especially if the new technologies allow people to be independent of large energy corporations. Solar, wind, geo-thermal, bio-chemical and many other alternative forms of energy would allow people a freedom from the tyranny of submission to Big Energy. That may be the underlying reason why there are so many who wish to delay energy liberation for as long as possible. If I had invested trillions in oil infrastructure I would want to milk it for all it was worth, it is the bottom line that drives all motivation by any business. Why should it be any different for API and the bottom line they represent?
If I vote against a, “use of force” bill, it still passes Congress, the President then mistakenly presumes or interprets it as a, “Declaration of War,” and then acts as if it were, where is a flip-flop on my part if only after one year reconstruction has not even began? I would have, even though I voiced a No Vote, had in 2004 wanted troops to stay in Iraq to fix the initial damage done by the War. Lets say 4 to 5 years go by and it becomes apparent that the Police Action, now called a War, is out of control costing a trillion dollars of tax payer funds, while profiteering and fraud run wild, and the world hits an all time record amount of terror attacks. This is only the tip of the poison spear that is the Iraq policy. Knowing all the scandals surrounding the newly released information surrounding the White House and the footing for what they call a War; how, even if back in 2004 I supported keeping troops in Iraq in order for a governmental system could solidify, would I continue to support keeping the military there in 2008? We know a lot more now than back in 2004. It was not until Jan. 30th 2005 when Iraq had their first Democratic Vote (they voted for a Theocracy) Even people who voted No on Iraq and today want all the troops out supported keeping them there until Iraq had the election. Obama has not committed a flip-flop in any way on Iraq. Four years after that vote our troops are still there. Why would any person with a memory of the past years spent in Iraq support remaining one day longer? Obama was right to vote No, he was right to not want to withdraw before the election of 2005 and he is correct to want to pull out the military within 16 months.
Only registered user allowed |
Libs are an overrated species! *rimshot*
July 7th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Sounds like a good show, too bad I will be in the bed by show time. I will catch it in the morning on a re-run.
July 7th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
Krikorian doesn’t sound like a Native American name. Get his ass outta here…
July 7th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
i think this particular immigration perspective is interesting.
July 7th, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Alan~ I’m sick of your empty promises about the new LL and alan.com. You just keep danglin’ that carrot in front of my face!
July 7th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
New family words: “neologism” maybe? That means new word creation.
I thought “wind chill factor” was “windshield factor” when I was little.
July 8th, 2008 at 12:16 am
I would choose my dog over lots of people. I would have been one of the people on the roof during Katrina that wouldn’t leave if they didn’t let me bring my dog Libby with me.
July 8th, 2008 at 12:31 am
ALAN….thingamajig IS in the webster dictionary! Tell your listeners!
July 8th, 2008 at 12:52 am
Cheryl: I wouldn’t blame Alan. I think Fox is technically challenged.
July 8th, 2008 at 7:26 am
Alan.com isn’t a fox property, is it?
July 8th, 2008 at 7:54 am
http://www.speakout.com/VoteMatch/results2008.asp?quiz=Pres2008&state=TOP&q1=1&q2=2&q3=1&q4=4&q5=5&q6=5&q7=2&q8=2&q9=4&q10=2&q11=2&q12=5&q13=2&q14=4&q15=2&q16=2&q17=2&q18=4&q19=1&q20=1&Submit=Score+the+quiz%21
July 8th, 2008 at 7:55 am
I sent my results to Tony Macrini, a local radio show host here, and got called “Comrade.”
Har
July 8th, 2008 at 9:52 am
i don’t really blame him, i’m just ready for the new stuff to be up. i think that alan.com is a fox site, but LL isn’t.
July 8th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Comrade. LOL
July 8th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
ABC News reported on 07-07-08 that yellow cake had been found in Iraq and shipped to the land of the Maple Leaf. Found? That is deception parading as news. The IAEA
(International Atomic Energy Agency) had been aware of the yellow cake long before we invaded Iraq. In fact it was left over from Saddam’s old energy program. Which ended with the first Gulf War. The yellow cake was not under Saddam’s control before or during our invasion; rather the IAEA was. The amount of yellow cake was not enough to even make a weapon. It was sealed by the IAEA. It was under US and International control. Why would the initial reports by a news agency report it as found or as a discovery? Perhaps, the reason is to influence public opinion with falsehood verging on propaganda during an election? What other reason would they have for such sloppy or incomplete reporting? I think it is clear what the reason is for such slop. If you are going to report news give the people a complete rundown. That would be only if you, the reporter cared about honesty or ethics in journalism. The only thing found was a new spin on old news.
July 8th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
If I vote against a, “use of force” bill, it still passes Congress, the President then mistakenly presumes or interprets it as a, “Declaration of War,” and then acts as if it were, where is a flip-flop on my part if only after one year reconstruction has not even began? I would have, even though I voiced a No Vote, had in 2004 wanted troops to stay in Iraq to fix the initial damage done by the War. Lets say 4 to 5 years go by and it becomes apparent that the Police Action, now called a War, is out of control costing a trillion dollars of tax payer funds, while profiteering and fraud run wild, and the world hits an all time record amount of terror attacks. This is only the tip of the poison spear that is the Iraq policy. Knowing all the scandals surrounding the newly released information surrounding the White House and the footing for what they call a War; how, even if back in 2004 I supported keeping troops in Iraq in order for a governmental system could solidify, would I continue to support keeping the military there in 2008? We know a lot more now than back in 2004. It was not until Jan. 30th 2005 when Iraq had their first Democratic Vote (they voted for a Theocracy) Even people who voted No on Iraq and today want all the troops out supported keeping them there until Iraq had the election. Obama has not committed a flip-flop in any way on Iraq. Four years after that vote our troops are still there. Why would any person with a memory of the past years spent in Iraq support remaining one day longer? Obama was right to vote No, he was right to not want to withdraw before the election of 2005 and he is correct to want to pull out the military within 16 months.
July 8th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
The recent API (American Petroleum Institute) advertising campaign has stated that the USA has enough energy supplies to last for 60 years. That sounds great, at first. This lame public relations operation is slick deception. This deceptions goal is the subversion of resources that hold a greater value than any oil or gas. The food supply that is generated by coastal areas is worth more than 60 odd years of energy. The tourism aspect of coastal areas is worth more than the energy and food supply combined. I ask, is it worth jeopardizing the purity of the coastal areas for a small supply of oil? Consider the way energy is being consumed. Consider the rate of demand and the continuing rise of price. Even if we have 60 years of supply in the US, within 30 years the price will still be sky high due to peak energy supplies and growing international demand. Oil or energy is traded internationally. We would have to have Congress pass legislation for all oil to remain within the boarder of the USA. People seem to forget this and API never mentions it in their advertisements. They only want to shape our opinion so that they can skirt environmental protections, which in reality protect local economic foundations like fishing and tourism. The American Petroleum Institute should tell their viewers that even if they had access to drill where they wished, there would not be any immediate relief in price at the pump for years. People seem to think that there would be an immediate relief if we open up Alaska’s ANWAR. This is not the reality. People do not realize that even if Iraq were at full production, plus OPEC increases in output, and an increase in Alaska’s oil drilling the price on the world market would not move below 100 dollars per barrel. Why? Geo-Political Factors, the Value of the Dollar, Future increase in Demand, and Peak Oil Realities. With 60 years of domestic oil and natural gas there will still be outlandish prices for which consumers will have to deal with. Oil is a dead end energy source. The only way to free ourselves from foreign oil is to free ourselves from oil entirely. We must investigate if the energy companies have shelved renewable energy patents. We must investigate energy that is renewable, cheap, clean, and put it in the hands of all who require it. There is too much to loose if people can be energy independent, especially if the new technologies allow people to be independent of large energy corporations. Solar, wind, geo-thermal, bio-chemical and many other alternative forms of energy would allow people a freedom from the tyranny of submission to Big Energy. That may be the underlying reason why there are so many who wish to delay energy liberation for as long as possible. If I had invested trillions in oil infrastructure I would want to milk it for all it was worth, it is the bottom line that drives all motivation by any business. Why should it be any different for API and the bottom line they represent?
July 8th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
The Census Bureau says that the population of the US is currently reproducing at a rate of about 1800 births per 2000 women, which is not even “replacement rate.”
So closing our doors to all immigrants would appear to be a program ending with our extinction.
July 9th, 2008 at 1:23 am
RC: Actually opening the doors with an immigration policy based on Multiculturalism is the program designed with our extinction… you’re importing cultures that intend on replacing the decling one.
That is exactly what is happening in Europe.. in each nation, the native culture is self-destructing and a rapidly growing hostile culture is in its midst waiting for the calender to assure its ascendency.
If we have an immigration policy which mandates an Americanization of newcomers (and it actually worked) , then by all means.. if you’re not a deadbeat, come to America.
Multiculturalism is the Suicide for the West.
Pluralism is what I advocate.
July 9th, 2008 at 1:48 am
RC,
What do you mean “we” white man? As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger as they were surrounded by Indians.
Robert Hume
July 9th, 2008 at 5:16 pm