White Supremacists Believe Obama Win Will Help Their Cause
August 8th, 2008, 12:35 PM EDT
It’s almost as though the bigots want Obama to win. David Duke says he’d be a “visual aid” that will demonstrate how whites have lost control of America.
Richard Barrett of the “Nationalist Movement”, who led a demonstration in Jena, Louisiana last January, says Obama is likely to win and that will cause an upheaval.
“Instead of this so-called civil rights bill, for example, that says you have to give preferences to minorities, I think the American people are going – once they see the ‘Obamanation’ – they’re going to demand a tweaking of that and say, ‘You have to put the majority into office,’” Barrett said.
I was waiting for this one…
August 8th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
Nuts are running loose all over the planet. In the old days nuts were restricted to vines and trees.
As old people die so does racism. Children are not being brought up with the same commonly held beliefs our grandparents did.
August 8th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
I must agree with Truth2Power here.
I read a post on another site, where the writer said:
“My generation doesn’t care about race or sexual orientation…Will you baby boomers die out already so we get about running the country?”
As a boomer myself, it was like slap in the face, then I thought; Well, I guess they’re reight…All righty then.
August 8th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
I can’t wait for our own “David Duke” to see this thread and comment on it. It would be interesting to hear what the “Save our land, join the Klan” Graffiti caller has to say about this.
August 8th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
VERY interesting quote there, Old Lefty. I’m part of the “I don’t care about race” generation.
August 8th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
My, such adorable old coots.
August 8th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Cheryl Carroll,
It was always a little suprising to me, when my kids were in college and would have friends that they spoke of for years.
Sometimes you meet them and they are black, and the kid NEVER mentioned it, over 4 years.
People of MY generation would have mentioned it because it was more rare, or because you were ready for a fight with a racist.
Now, they think it’s too inconsequential to mention.
That’s wonderful!
August 8th, 2008 at 1:50 pm
OldLefty, us boomers started this new generation. At least those of us who didn’t fall into the racist rut our parents dug. I was a child in the 60’s, but I remember it was about that time that race began not to be such a big deal. At that time I still lived back east. No one cared about the skin color when they took their pants off.
August 8th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
It’s our children that don’t look at the color for God’s sake!!!!
August 8th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
I’M NOT READY TO DIE DAMMIT
August 8th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Thermadorian reaction anyone? Will the Barrett Revolt overthrow the Obamas the way the Glorious Revolution overthrew the Cromwells? Should be interesting.
August 8th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Yes, all these are fine valid points. The real question is, how do we blame this on Islam?
August 8th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
I’m sure someone will find a way. Obama is a secret muslim.
August 8th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
heh heh heh
August 8th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
I’M NOT READY TO DIE DAMMIT
by LV Lives August 8, 2008 at 1:54 pm
…………………………………
Don’t blame me… I’m just passing on what a young whippersnapper said!
August 8th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Hey!! Mr. Colmes?!!
I thought you just promised us that if we ignored “David Duke” he’d go away?
Nope. Sometimes you have to get right back in their face and fight back.
August 8th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
Well we know what duke’ll say: it’s all some Zionist Bolshevik Muslim blah blah blah plot to destroy America blah blah blah and lefties suck blah blah blah.
Rave on. Rave on.
August 8th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
hahahahaah that’s good RC
August 8th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
haha RC…
August 8th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Yes, all these are fine valid points. The real question is, how do we blame this on Islam?
Better questions…
How can we blame it on clinton?
How can we blame it on bush?
August 8th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Fury said~
“Yes, all these are fine valid points. The real question is, how do we blame this on Islam?”
Vince will be through soon to copy and paste a book or full 3 hour talk show transcript from Glenn Beck explaining the connection to the Jihadists. Wait, I’m sorry, explaining the connection to all Muslims in general.
August 8th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
Vince just shakes his head at how immature you be. what an example you must be settin for your kid(s).
August 8th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
A very loving, strong, and tolerant one.
Sorry your mama didn’t teach YOU those qualities.
August 8th, 2008 at 6:00 pm
OBAMA-RECAPTURE KICKS OFF WITH A BANG
The drive to re-take the White House from Barack Obama has kicked
off with a bang, even before the presidential-election. Within hours of
the announcement by Richard Barrett that the “backlash” had begun,
news-sources around the world flashed the news. From the “Boston
Globe” to the “Taipai Times”, attention focused on the prediction
that Obama would go in, but that an “upheaval” would energize
Americans to recapture the government. The story was the first effort
by the Associated Press to employ new technology and involved video,
television, print and audio, all at once. The news-agency assembled a
TV-crew in Mississippi for the production, which featured flattering
pictures of Barrett and less-complimentary photos of his octogenarian
detractors, with Barrett as the lead. Nationalist web-traffic
immediately skyrocketed.
Gerald McManus was thrilled, noting that everyone else was
“playing second-fiddle” to the Nationalists. The Associated
Press called Nationalists “Nationalists,” despite attempts by
pro-minority-activists Mark Potock and Randy Blazak to substitute
smears and stereotypes. “Nationalists had to break through the
news-media barrier in order to be a social-reform magnet and we have
succeeded,” said Barrett. The piece referred to antagonist William
Winter, a member of the defunct, Clinton race-board, as a
“statesman,” even though Winter’s signature-notoriety had been in
failing to defeat the Confederate-flag vote in Mississippi. Winter,
86, expressed doubt that there would be any “widespread” backlash,
but even Negroes disagreed. Negress Kim Edwards lamented that, even
in the Oval Office, Obama “won’t be recognized as an American
President.”
Jason Robb, a lawyer who described himself as a “Nationalist,”
concurred that “Obama’s election could prompt more whites to get
involved in politics,” which Barrett said could break out into a
revolution. Barrett compared Skinheads to Minutemen of the American
Revolution, noting that the fifty-states could come together against
Martin Luther King, the way the thirteen-colonies united against King
George III. “The same thing can happen now,” he predicted. Barrett
insisted that elevation of minorities, under “Obamanation,” was
already setting off a drive to reinstall the “majority” and divest
minorities. Blazak described the Nationalist goal as the “Leave It to
Beaver” society, beneficial to “white, working-class people.” “Those
were the ‘good old days’ for straight, white males,” according to
self-described integrationist Blazak.
The Associated Press declined to describe Nationalists as
“pro-majority,” as they term themselves, insisting that the term
“pro-majority” was “elusive.” Approximately fifteen-percent of
reports describe Nationalists as “pro-majority” and twenty-percent as
“Nationalists.” The agency did, however, quote pro-minority activist
Charles Evers, who agreed that the Nationalists’ message was
“popular.” Evers, 84, who has debated Barrett on various occasions,
had previously said, “Oh, God, no,” when told that Americans were
demanding that the country be taken back. McManus, who spearheaded
the Nationalists’ drive to reinstate the Saint Patrick’s Day Parade
in Boston, exulted that Nationalists were “becoming the spokesman for
the entire cause.” Edwards claimed that Nationalists wished to
assassinate Obama, but Barrett urged that the overthrow be
“peaceful.”
Marie Pena of the Spanish news-agency inquired why Americans would
install Obama and, immediately, turn on him. Barrett explained that
the investiture was “the result of a generation of welfare, riots,
blackmail and political-corruption,” which the new-generation “will
be finally seeing in its full, sordid impact and be quick to overturn.”
Barrett said that, once evident, the recapture-drive would be
“unstoppable.” “We either move to Greenland or take America
back,” he emphasized, “but we aren’t planning to leave.” Reaction
to the Nationalist offensive from the political-left was swift. A
Communist-journalist asked, “Does white-trash really expect to do
what they say?” Barrett observed that majority-rule ousting
minority-tyranny had alrerady taken place in Czechoslovakia,
Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. “It’s all a matter of patriotism and
progress,” he beamed.
http://www.nationalist.org/news/releases/2008/080801.html
Copyright 2008 The Nationalist Movement
August 8th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
So once again “Liberals” are defending the heinous crime committed by the lawless “black” youth of Jena LA. This band of thugs attacked an innocent white student and beat him nearly to death even though he had nothing to do with the knots that were hung from a tree. This band of RACIST THUGS were so proud of their accomplishment that they raided the “defense fund” (I say reward) started in appreciation by supposed “Leaders of Black America” and posed on their MySpace adorned with $100.00 bills in mouths and strewn across their ape like bodies. This exemplifies the disparity between those of “that” race and those of races who have evolved. The administration of that school district was cowardly when they removed a tree that white students sat under. Why didn’t the district remove the tree that blacks stood under? Why commit and act of reverse racism and deprive white students of protection against the harmful rays of the sun? The fact that this “black” community in Jena supported these criminals who all had numerous previous convictions for violent crime can only show that they condoned and approved of the violent, almost murderous acts perpetrated against a those of the civilized white community. It is time for the return of “justice by the rope” and I can name 3 perfect candidates to reestablish this honored tradition.
August 8th, 2008 at 10:42 pm
“Vince just shakes his head at how immature you be.” by Vince P August 8, 2008 at 5:45 pm
When you talk about yourself in the third person that way, it means something. I’m not sure what it means but it can’t be good.
Bob Dole used to do that, too. It made for many good SNL skits back around ‘96 when he ran against Clinton.
August 8th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
I must agree with Truth2Power here.
Watch that old lefty. It’s the first step off the planks of liberalism.
August 9th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Truth2Power,
I disagree entirely.
I believe that critical, free thinking is the cornerstone of liberalism.
Although, to be honest, I believe that was ALSO true of conservatives, before they were hijacked by the Christian right and the 1% of the world’s rich and shameless.
I’m so old, I remember when this country used to run best when the divide was 48 – 52, or 45 – 55, and nobody talked of “Permanent Majorities”.
August 9th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
I believe that critical, free thinking is the cornerstone of liberalism.
Although, to be honest, I believe that was ALSO true of conservatives, before they were hijacked by the Christian right and the 1% of the world’s rich and shameless.
And now, the richest 1% are democrats go figure how things go around.
I’m so old, I remember when this country used to run best when the divide was 48 – 52, or 45 – 55, and nobody talked of “Permanent Majorities”.
Politics will be making major changes coming up. Technology is changing things that the balance of power is slowly shifting to we the people. Today, we can go to a speech with our cellphones/cameras and record it. Then post it on youtube or some blog. The politicians now have to start being honest and straight up.
I have a few ideas to fix the government, of course the ruling class will never go for it.
1. Government is not a family run business, don’t think you can pass it down your family. Meaning no more kennedy family members in office, no more bushes, clintons, gores, etc.
2. Held to a higher standard. Convicted of a crime, twice the penalty of a regular season. Time to “send a message” to the ruling class.
3. Not only do we get to vote people into office, we can vote them off the public payroll.
4. No jumping from one political position to another. Here in los angeles we have a career politician called laura chick.
5. No more with-holding tax. Make “we the people” save the money for taxes until april 14th, then write one big check to the federal government. Not only do we get the benefit of the interest on the saved $ but now how much we pay in taxes will be obvious. The plan to take it from us doesn’t let us appreciate the screwing we are getting.
6. Make it legal to shoot/kill politicians. Okay, I’m kidding on this one.
August 10th, 2008 at 1:21 am
Truth2Power,
The most important point that I agree with you on…
“the ruling class will never go for it.”
It’s taken them a long time for them to shut We the People out.
Now that they have so many pacified with ‘bread and circus’, I don’t know how we get it back short of keeping pressure on them, threatening to kick them out in the primaries, and send even a little bit of money to those who DO the right thing, (AND send a photocopy of the check to YOUR guy with the message that, “here’s where MY money goes!”)
But it’s infuriating when you get the standard form letter back, starting with….Thank you for contacting me…like you sent them a good letter.
August 10th, 2008 at 10:58 am
Truth2Power,
The most important point that I agree with you on…
Watch that old lefty. Now it’s two steps off the planks of liberalism. :)
August 11th, 2008 at 12:48 am