$3.7 Million Offered For Woman’s Virginity
Natalie Dylan is auctioning off her virginity to pay for her Master’s Degree.
Miss Dylan, from San Diego, California, USA, said she was persuaded to offer herself to the highest bidder after her sister Avia, 23, paid for her own degree after working as a prostitute for three weeks.
She said she had had a lot of attention from a wide range of men, including “weirdos”, “those who get really graphically sexual about what they want to do to me” and “lots of polite requests from rich businessmen”.
Miss Dylan said she did not think it was particularly significant to be willing to sell your virginity and insisted that she was happy to undergo medical tests for any doubters.
And she wants to be clear on one thing: This is not about having a relationship. It’s a one night stand, and that’s it. Is one roll in the hay really worth millions of dollars?
Do the ends justify the means? Depends on your morality. (Of course, if you’re an atheist then morality is irrelevant and ANYTHING GOES! Always gotta throw that in.)
Is this an example of slut who is still a virgin? Is that even possible?
January 12th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Uh, what? I’m an atheist, my “morality” is just as relevent as yours. I just don’t need an old book to tell me how to be a good person, I can think for myself, thank you very much.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Hmmmm? Seems pricey. Will she take a check?
MUCH MORE IMPORTANTLY on Hanratty tonight!
WILL the Rev Al Sharpton (spirt-led) Pie Bachmann -in-the-Face OR Hanratty?
9PM ET. Faux News.
I say Bachmann.
Don’t forget your drinking game. Final Version #4.
Take a drink every time Michele Bachmann
-Lies
-Leers at camera while smiling insanely
-Interrupts anyone
Drink up if Bachmann says:
-she is a foster mother of 26
-she is a federal tax litigation attorney
-Journalists need to investigate Congress Commies
-She never said the above
-She mentions husband Marcus the de-Gayer
-is focused like a laser beam
-Chris Matthews put words in her mouth
January 12th, 2009 at 5:43 pm
unbelievable that this is news…
January 12th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
I find this distrubing, but she is hot, but it is still disturbing.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Old News!
January 12th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Her sister, Avia, is a real good role model, huh? I wonder if she does motivational speaking events? “you can be anything you wanna be, just look at me! I slept with random guys for 3 weeks to pay for I wanted to be!” “You can do it, too!”
I’m so motivated, right now…
January 12th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
I’ll let her sleep with me for 3.6 million, but pillow talk is extra.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
She is officially the world’s most expensive hooker…that’ll look great on a resume.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
Gross. I think sooo much less of this woman now. I don’t even know her beyond this blog post and she is grossing me out. I think I’m gonna puke.
She should just skip this and sell her body like a piece of meat. If she is only as vauble as her … then she should be out there getting STDs and having a great time with fat bastards and wife beaters and those types.
What is even more disgusting is that she is getting enough offers to make the figure so high. People obviously think something good happens when you have sex with an attractiv woman beyond just sex. Like the sky will open up and money will rain down from above. Sad and pathetic.
What if she was a man? A man selling his viginity would get about, I dunno, ten bucks. How about some ugly, fat woman selling her virginity? Maybe about 15 bucks.
Miss Dylan is glad I don’t know her personally becuase I’d have a big earfull for her about this. No self-respect at all. I want nothing to do with this woman and any woman who thinks so low of themselves.
Try this out guys: Say no to a hot woman when she wants something from you. Prove your not a slave to them and suddenly they respect you more.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
How entertaining to see bible-thumpers condemning this girl…when in fact the bible is full of ‘auctioned’ daughters, lol
The only difference is that in this 2000 year-old misogynist text, it was the FATHER, not the daughter that got the shekels!!
LMAO
January 12th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
“[S]he was happy to undergo medical tests for any doubters.”
There’s a small problem with that statement… The hymen, the “proof of virginity”, doesn’t even exist. It’s a myth. I can’t find an English translation of the Danish article I’m citing (http://avisen.dk/myten-om-moedommen-punkteret_13240.aspx), so you’ll have to trust me on this one.
A huge groups of Swedish and Danish gynecologists and midwives have gotten together to release this article. There is no hymen. There is a membrane that outlines the opening of the vagina, but it doesn’t “break” when you have sex. Women have it until the day they die. The reason some women bleed the first time they have sex (it’s only one in five who bleed), is because they’re tighter, and probably more tense, than a person who has had sex before, and blood vessels in said membrane may burst.
This means that there is no physical way of telling if a woman has had sex before. Knowing this, virginity stops being worth anything in a physical sense, doesn’t it? I doubt this guy paid 3,7 million for her virginal mind. I guess a man might find it exciting to “go where no man has gone before”, but in a purely physical sense he might as well do her sister, or any other prostitute.
The article goes on to say that the hymen myth was created and encouraged by men as a way of controlling women and female sexuality. Which makes a lot of sense, when you consider how the Old Testament demands we stone any woman who doesn’t bleed on her wedding night. Middle Eastern cultures still push the myth relentlessly.
Wow, tl;dr on virginity and hymens. Sorry about that.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
FROSTY,
What bible-thumpers are you talking about? Do you think it’s okay for this girl to be doing something like this in the name of education?
January 12th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Do you think it’s okay for this girl to be doing something like this in the name of education?
I’m not Frosty, but there are worse ways to earn 3.7 million. More power to her (but the dude is NUTS, NUTS, NUTS!)
January 12th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
I’d rather have Michele Bachmann. She is one classy lady, smart, and a fox too.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
I find it unlikely that someone with her attitude toward virginity would live to the age of 22 without previously getting herself deflowered.
And this is to pay for a masters degree in Family and Marriage therapy?
Next she’ll be telling us what a Christian she is.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
I’d Hit it. ;)
January 12th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
[...] Alan Colmes’ Liberaland, The Other McCain and [...]
January 12th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
I agree with Um,
The guy is nuts. I don’t see what is worth 3.7 mil when a two dollar magazine and a bottle of hand cream will do the trick.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
I could see maybe 500 bucks but that’s it.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
“”What bible-thumpers are you talking about? Do you think it’s okay for this girl to be doing something like this in the name of education?”‘
Amongst them, the first poster…although I admit that you all seem united in your condemning of this entrepenuerial young lady?
I mean, what happened to the joy of the free market? Where’s your support for uber-capitalism and the American dream, lol?
I would think that you would support the right of this women to do what shes wants? And if some Saudi prince is fool enough to pay, good on the girl!
I should remind you, though, that many young females the world over use their sexuality for profit and gain…so what?
World’s second oldest profession, remember?
January 12th, 2009 at 7:26 pm
Been there…done that and it was barely worth a 5 star dinner? LOL 3.7 million ??? maybe she can get a # 9 grant !
January 12th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
How entertaining to see bible-thumpers condemning this girl…when in fact the bible is full of ‘auctioned’ daughters, lol
The only difference is that in this 2000 year-old misogynist text, it was the FATHER, not the daughter that got the shekels!!
LMAO
Posted by badmrfrosty
January 12th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Mr Frosty – For a man of such obvious intelligence (and I mean that sincerely) and who seems to be appalled by anything “spiritual”, it seems you almost want to elicit religious-based debate based on your frequent injection of anti-Bible/anti-Christian rhetoric. :)
By the way – I’ve been trying to figure out why you almost always refer to Christ followers as “big C christians”. I’m just curious.
Rise’
January 12th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
Hey Rise’!
Hadn’t seen you around in a while – so if you don’t mind me asking, who did you end up voting for? If you voted for Obama, are you still glad you did?
January 12th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Wait, if she gets 3.7mil, why then go to school?
I wonder what she is going to report on her taxes?
January 12th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Hi, Um!
I come on the blog every now and then but I mostly read and post every now and then. I have to admit – I can’t keep up with most of you on here – too smart for me I guess! :)
Voting was a struggle for me. I really do view myself as a “Republicrat”. I know I’ll get hammered from some people here, but I voted the experience factor and my social convictions which are conservative. In retrospect, and in my heart of hearts, do I think McCain would be the best leader in these troublesome times – probably not. Obama’s health care and other plans would have benefited my daughter greatly but I just couldn’t break with the convictions of my heart.
I will tell you that I have high hopes for Obama, and I pray to God that his presidency will be a blessed one. You won’t hear me voice any negativity about him until it’s deserved, and thus far it is not.
So am I the scourge of the earth now? :)
Rise’
January 12th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Rise’:
You’re a lot smarter than you give yourself credit.
I’ve read your posts and have responded to them too. You think for yourself instead of letting some media screwball think for you. A lot of the comments you see on here are quick google searches and widipedia.
Thank you very much for giving Obama a chance. You are a good American.
Mark
January 12th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Rise’,
Rat’s, I thought we had turned you ;^)
Hope you daughter is well, take care.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
This lady is getting her masters degree and this is the best she can do? Good grief.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
[...] Also: Ron Chusid of Liberal Values; Alan Colmes of Liberal Land You Might Enjoy These Related Posts Also:After What Seems Like A Decade Of Silence, G.O.P. [...]
January 12th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
POSTED BY BLISSFULCONSERVATIVE
You gotta problem with that?
If there’s some dude stupid enough to give away 3 mil for nothing then it’s probably good he doesn’t have it anyway. I’m guessing she’ll find a better way to redistribute it.
This, of course, is assuming the story is true… which it’s not.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
PFKAM,
Heck ya I have a problem with it.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:52 pm
I did a quick back o’ the envelope calculation, and I believe I could obtain a lifetime’s supply of Belarus virgins for the same price.
Sorry, no sale.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
The goods look good,but the price to high.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
Um, don’t worry I was teetering all the way to the point of “cast ballot”. I must say, though, by coming here to Liberaland to have my thoughts challenged I can honestly say I voted MY convictions, not the GOP.
Mark – thank you for your kindness.
Rise’
January 12th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
Hey Dude:
You’re supposed to be watching Cards vs. Notre Dame.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
I watch them and a win in ot over ND.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Louisville climbing in the polls… #15? maybe?
January 12th, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Yep like Joe the Plummer gaing fame.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Don’t be fool my friends! she was my patient 4-months ago.The Hymenorrhaphy procedure was a success ,but the rectorrhaphy was not.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:45 pm
That’s funny Pierre. I actually knew a girl once who considered herself a virgin because she only took it anally. She claimed that she was saving herself for her husband for religious reasons but she smoked pot like a chimney and took it up the a**. Never could wrap my head around that one but it worked for my roommate who dated her for a while.
January 12th, 2009 at 11:06 pm
In addition,Placefield, she was Orally gifted.
January 12th, 2009 at 11:29 pm
Funny how I am called a “Bible-thumper” even though I made absolutely no mention of any religious text in my post OR any scripture from any religious text.
“I can think for myself [and be a good person].” Good based on WHAT? “[The Bible allows bad things!]” Bad based on what? Relativistic morality is fascinating to me. You may disparage those of us who believe in moral absolutes, and a Higher Power, but outside of religion, how can any rational, intelligent person derive anything but nihilism from this world?
January 12th, 2009 at 11:29 pm
Isn’t prostitution illegal in California?
January 12th, 2009 at 11:37 pm
Flapp:
Why did you say that?
January 12th, 2009 at 11:47 pm
by the looks of her pose in this photo, she is obviously experienced in opening her legs.
January 13th, 2009 at 12:32 am
What’s the chances of her getting arrested for for prostitution?
January 13th, 2009 at 12:52 am
Flapp,
By this time in my life, I am able, willing (and entitled) to make certain assumptions about posters, based on what they say, and where they say it.
The fact that you went right for the kill with your (atheists have no moral values/ anything goes) nonsense shows you clearly to be one of the millions of Americans that think that the only “good” people are religious people.
Of course there was a chance that you were a muslim fundamentalist, they too think the only way man is ‘good’ is by divine order and obedience to god’s command. However your crude use of the term ’slut’ shows this to be unlikely.
Naw, I think I hit the nail on the head. You are a big “C” christian – the worst and most harmful kind of christian. These types of ‘christians’ don’t really give a toot about the actual teachings of Christ.
Instead, they are part of a’club’ of intolerant, frightened-of-death, and largely ignorant-of-science people that feel they have a direct line to ‘god’ because they get together and listen to some (usually charismatic) preacher shout and rail on about how we are all “inherently” evil (sinners) and how “Jesus died for your sins (not mine, he didn’t, thank you very much) and all the rest of the hooey that goes with it.
They think that ‘god’ disapproves of gays, dope-smoking, taxes, liberals, thrash metal, and any number of things that god, if she exists, wouldn’t give a tinker’s damn about anyway…instead they are things that ‘conservatives’ don’t like.
And the worst kind of hypocrite is one who presumes to know the mind of their god, isn’t it?
When in fact what bothers big “C” christians is anything or anybody that lives outside the narrow confines of their OWN lives.
They didn’t understand science in high school and so they are relieved to find like-minded people. They are “empowered” by the strength in their numbers, and feel that “only they” know how the rest of us should live our lives.
They think the bible is somehow written by god himself, and they refuse to accept the truth, that it was written by men. Supersticious men that feared death, lightning and earthquakes!
I truly feel sorry for the minority of people that don’t feel a natural compassion for their fellow man, without being told by ‘god’ to do so. Only the fear of hell keeps these people in line, apparently.
And this carp about Atheists having no morality, unbelievable. The atheists I know are humanists. They have compassion and love for humanity without passing the buck to some intangible deity. They are healers, scientists, teachers, social activists, artists, engineers etc etc.
They don’t need to be told by a “god” to have compassion.
Do organized religions do good works? Of course many do.
But there’s always a trade-off, isn’t there? Are they also a bit selective about who gets their help? You bet!
The Catholic church for instance has many charities and causes – but do they promote safer sex in third world countries?
No, in fact the pope actively lies and says condoms don’t help, and that contraception is a sin!
Horrifying. Religions that support this nonsense have the blood of millions of the poor dying of aids on their hands!!
So yeah, you’re a ‘bible thumper’…
January 13th, 2009 at 12:53 am
Perhaps FLAPP can explain why Christians make up 95% of those in prison.
While Atheists and Agnostics make up less that 1%.
Conservative figures put A/A at 9% of the population. Christians make up 81% (84% if you include the pseudo Christians and cults).
January 13th, 2009 at 3:10 am
Times are tough. This girl seems to have been led astray by her sister. I guess I can’t blame her too much, however, as too many women use their wiles to get what they want – even in marriage. It is “just” a one night stand, but in a way, it is “just” giving up. I hate to see anyone give up.
January 13th, 2009 at 5:07 am
[...] Alan Colmes asks, Is one roll in the hay really worth millions of dollars? [...]
January 13th, 2009 at 7:55 am
Mr. Frosty,
I know this will mean precious little and I know this is not the place to “pump sunshine” but I mean this from the very bottom of my heart. I apologize. You have obviously heard a lot of venom spewed from mouths/keyboards in the name of Christianity. I just want you to know there are church-goers and there are Christians. A Christian is one who strives to be Christ-like. There are many people who fill the church pews and the pulpits who have no business wearing the name Christian, and if there truly is a heaven they won’t be seeing it.
I personally believe, that Christ represents our hope. We put our hope for tomorrow in Christ whereas Atheists put their hope for tomorrow in Science – that in no way makes one a better/smarter person than the other. Personally I put my hope in both because I look at Science as a God-given gift to man.
As a person who has both sought divine intervention as well as scientific/medical intervention for the healing of my daughter, and have been disappointed on both sides, I understand how easy it is to not believe. I’ve been tempted to go down that road at times myself, but something keeps drawing me back – and that is hope. Perhaps it shows my weakness as a person, I don’t know, but I can get through this hell my family has been allowed to suffer much easier with hope of eternity.
Thank you, Mr. Frosty, for always challenging me/us to examine what we believe and why we believe it. Your posts, while often stinging, are always thought provoking and cause me to search my heart and thus far I come back to my same conclusion – without hope I have nothing and for me Christ is that hope.
Respectfully,
Rise’
P.S. I’m still bummed about all I’ve learned regarding the founding fathers – that one has been a bitter pill to swallow! :)
January 13th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Typical liberal pap….anything goes do anything for a liberal education.
January 13th, 2009 at 10:49 am
Good post rise(n)…
And you’re right, I have heard and read much hatred from religions. But what does man’s ‘religion’ and church, really, have to do with ‘god’?, I remind myself. This sounds odd, indeed, doesn’t it? But bear with me…
I don’t have to look far to see the damage that an unwavering belief in a “holy” book does, do I? Or a tribal-like following of a certain organized religion, to the exclusion of all others?
In general, Rise(n) I probably should try harder to explain that I believe there is a huge difference in believing in ‘god(s)’, or for that matter, the teachings of Christ (which were generally quite nice)….a big difference between that (Christianity) and what, as you know, I call ‘Big “C” christianity…which I think I outlined in my gentle and diplomatic manner at 12:53.
;-)
The only point of contention I have here is this:
You say:
“”We put our hope for tomorrow in Christ whereas Atheists put their hope for tomorrow in Science”"
Fair enough, but:
You can no more fairly lump all atheists together as believing that “hope is in science”, than you can lump all Christians in as believing in the holy trinity, or speaking in tongues, or handling poisonous snakes for that matter…
While it is true that the VAST majority of scientists are technically atheists…at least when it comes to a ‘personal’ god that looks over our shoulder, disapproves of rap music, creates the earth in 6 days…etc etc…
….many scientists ( my retired biologist dad amongst them – he’s a Quaker, as is me mom!)) believe in some sort of binding force, a common humanity, an enlightened ‘involuntary’ compassion that humans have for each other…and they are happy to call that force, or power, ‘God’.
In short, they are humanists, and believe, like Christ did, that there is good in ALL of us…It’s the CHURCH who has decided we’re all filled with sin, and are evil, and should be ashamed of ourselves!
No thanks.
…sadly, we ARE only human. We are beasts. And as such we are tribal and xenophobic…things that were useful to us in the early days of our consciousness. And when we blindly follow our ‘holy books’ as history, law and science…we often lose sight of the real beauty of mankind – that inside, we are ALL the same species/race/people. And that we meant to care for each other, and have compassion, and empathy, and understanding…not all this war about whose god(s) is more merciful, or whose ‘tribe’ is the “best in the world”…
All things that I think, at the end of the day, ALL religions aspire to, but so few achieve…
Although there are many small candles that try to light the darkness…
peace
john
January 13th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
Mr. Frosty (John)-
You’re right. I did make a broad assumption when I said “…Atheists put their hope in Science.” That wasn’t meant to be an unfair categorical assessment, I just assumed that would be a logical deduction…my bad. Perhaps the root of the problem is my ignorance of other philosphies – I believe you’ve mentioned that to other posters, and it is a point well taken.
You are so right about the organized Christian church/religion. They are man-made. While I belong to a church, I recognize that all organized “religion” is man-made and is generally flawed. “The Church” (in my case Christian Church) has become an institution rather than a like-minded people getting off their rears to share the love of Christ by feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, etc. It’s my heart’s desire to change even a little portion of that.
Have a great evening.
Rise’
January 13th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
While it is true that the VAST majority of scientists are technically atheists
Not in my experience (andI don’t know what you mean by ‘technically’)
January 13th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
How do we know for sure that she’s a virgin?
Also, if someone wants to pay for it they can have it.
Also, what if a WOMAN won the bid?
January 13th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Geez, and I thought Spitzer paid too much!
January 13th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
UM CARA, read it again:
I said, clearly IMO
“While it is true that the VAST majority of scientists are technically atheists…at least when it comes to a ‘personal’ god…”
I’m not going to do your dictionary/WIKI research for you mate, if you didn’t know what I meant by ‘personal’ god…google it.
And so they are ‘technically’ atheists when it comes to a ‘personal’ god, because is it simply not possible to do any meaningful science whilst believing that the earth was created in 6 days, is 6000 years old, evolution is a “made-up lie” and that ‘cave men’ interacted with dinosaurs, LOL
And so I can’t even imagine what “your experience” with science and scientists is… Astrology? Levitation? Perpetual motion machines?
Rabbits in the Cambrian fossil record perhaps?
heh heh
January 13th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Wonder where frosty gets his numbers for this claim. most scientists believe in a God.
The leader of the Human Genome Project of all peopel is a believer. Oh I know frosty, read it and weep. Do a litle more research and you might actually find that once again, you are wrong.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/index.html
January 13th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
Actually, 3.7 million dollars is rather cheap if you compare it to the over 50 million dollars the Republicans spent on Bill Clinton’s blowjob.
January 13th, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Sorry, I couldn’t resist!
January 13th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
Lame.
January 13th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
BM,
I’m not going to do your dictionary/WIKI research for you mate, if you didn’t know what I meant by ‘personal’ god…google it.
I didn’t ask you to, just said I didn’t know what you meant by ‘technical’ atheist. You didn’t need to explain it to me if you didn’t want to.
And so they are ‘technically’ atheists when it comes to a ‘personal’ god, because is it simply not possible to do any meaningful science whilst believing that the earth was created in 6 days, is 6000 years old, evolution is a “made-up lie” and that ‘cave men’ interacted with dinosaurs, LOL
Plenty of folks who are not atheists don’t believe that, including a devout southern baptist principle scientist I worked for.
And so I can’t even imagine what “your experience” with science and scientists is… Astrology? Levitation? Perpetual motion machines?
Worked in a research lab for a couple of years, got my undergrad in chemistry, started graduate work in environmental chemistry, but dropped out in the pursuit of filthy lucre. Have maintained my lifelong interest in science, subscribe to the journals Science and Nature, and participate in a small astrophysics group where I currently work (mostly we just swap books and chat about them). Have a few friends who are professors (biology and chemistry).
Astrology? Levitation? Perpetual motion machines?
I dated a girl who believed in astrology, so I guess I have some experience with it. I have seen illusionists ‘perform’ levitation, so you can call that experience too. Haven’t run into a perpetual motion machine though, stupid law of thermodynamics.
Rabbits in the Cambrian fossil record perhaps?
Wabbits are wiley and waskely, but I don’t think they were around way back then.
You have some weird assumptions. And weird ideas about what science is.
January 13th, 2009 at 10:28 pm
Danielle: LOL!
January 13th, 2009 at 10:45 pm
OK UM CARA, no worries.
I`m pretty sure you already know the difference between a Deist and a Theist.
– Between Francis Collins’ gentle and unassuming belief that “God”, e.g.”the creator force” used evolution over billions of years as a tool of ‘creation’…And a bible-thumping new-earth creationist that believes all the nonsense of the bible, and believes in a ‘personal’ God, – the interventionalist, over-the-shoulder watching, Jesus-as-divine God that a Theist believes in?
If not, when you get around to losing the big ole Red White and Blue chip on your shoulder that I seem to have caused with my criticism of US policy, I’d be happy to rap more about it.
You have WAY more experience, education and interest in science than I would have ever have guessed, given your use of straw man arguments , which you seem, to me anyway, to keep using to imply that the God of Einstein, Newton and now Collins, is the God of the Christian church.
I will repeat my position once more, slightly re-iterated, and see if you can even manage a half-hearted salute…?
“” A firm majority of credible, published, and peer-reviewed scientists are atheists, when it comes to the God of the bible, (The ‘personal’ God) and all the hooey that goes with it: Virgin births, 980 year-old men, Resurrection of the dead, the trinity, heaven, hell… Et cetera.
Any luck?
No?
Yeah?
Anyway, I kinda dug your ad hominem attack. I know I probably was meant to insulted, oops, sorry:
“”You have some weird assumptions. And weird ideas about what science is.”"
I do? Cool. Thanks UM CARA.
How did you know?
Did you see a pic of me with my tinfoil hat?
Because if you did, erm, it was a Halloween party!
That’s my story and I’M A’STICKIN’ TO IT!
January 14th, 2009 at 2:23 am
3.7 million for one virgin? I heard of a way to get 72 for free.. it takes some indoctrination time and well you gotta die but a bargain is a bargain. Ok actually I don’t believe this story but she is smokin hot!!!
January 14th, 2009 at 2:58 am
Craig said: 3.7 million for one virgin? I heard of a way to get 72 for free..
Craig,
I wonder how long it takes them – while working their way through their 72 virgins – to realize that when they get done they will have 72 wives?
January 14th, 2009 at 3:08 am
BM,
I`m pretty sure you already know the difference between a Deist and a Theist.
Right. And I know the difference between a deist and an atheist too.
If not, when you get around to losing the big ole Red White and Blue chip on your shoulder that I seem to have caused with my criticism of US policy, I’d be happy to rap more about it.
I don’t really think I have a chip on my shoulder re: your criticism of US policy, it’s when you make broad generalizations about a country you don’t know nearly as much about as you think you do that irritates me.
You, on the other hand, have a pretty big chip on your shoulder re: religion.
You have WAY more experience, education and interest in science than I would have ever have guessed, given your use of straw man arguments , which you seem, to me anyway, to keep using to imply that the God of Einstein, Newton and now Collins, is the God of the Christian church.
Can you please point to a few instances where I keep doing that?
I will repeat my position once more, slightly re-iterated, and see if you can even manage a half-hearted salute…?
A firm majority of credible, published, and peer-reviewed scientists are atheists, when it comes to the God of the bible, (The ‘personal’ God) and all the hooey that goes with it: Virgin births, 980 year-old men, Resurrection of the dead, the trinity, heaven, hell… Et cetera.
That’s not re-iterating, that is saying something completely different than your original statement I commented on. Remember it?
While it is true that the VAST majority of scientists are technically atheists
as for:
I was referring to the fact that you think things like astrology have anything to do with science, and your assumption that I was a creationist. It wasn’t meant to be an insult, just an observation. I apologize that it came across as an insult.
January 14th, 2009 at 8:42 am
[...] Grad student Natalie Dylan tells Alan why she’s auctioning off her virginity to pay for her Master’s [...]
January 14th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Virgin? Yeah right, my dad is the Pope. Hopefully the skanktress gets popped for prostitution, interstate solicitation, wire fraud, etc. She’s been poked more than my granny’s pin cushion. Even with the Glamour Shot she ain’t worth 1/100 of the high bid. A sucker and his ill gotten money are soon to part.
January 15th, 2009 at 12:13 am
This is a scam!
I’d also be suprised if the so called high bid is actually real as the spread (no pun intended) between high bid and next highest bid is so great. But at 1 million, that’s not a bad take.
That whore house in Nevada which she spoke of in the interview with Alan Colmes is behind it.
Remember: There’s a sucker born every minute!
January 15th, 2009 at 5:20 am
I wonder if he has seen what she looks like. She really is not particularly pretty. She may have to wear a bag over her head!
January 15th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
Take a real good look at her photo. Do you ACTUALLY think she’s still a virgin? And let’s be honest here. What guy other than an OB/GYN could “tell” if a woman is a virgin or not?
Or to put it another way, she’s a one-time prostitute who wants a dumb male to pay for the illusion she’s a virgin.
She’s a virgin in the same way Jessica Hahn was when she and Bakker did it in a hotel room. Her claim of being a ” church secretary” who supposedly was slipped a mickey and lost her virginity to Bakker didn’t mesh when the story broke and she came out in public looking a lot like a porno actress.
Betcha this woman is just as phony.
January 20th, 2009 at 1:11 pm