Revealed: E-mails Between Sanford and “Maria”
South Carolina’s The State newspaper has released a few excerpts of e-mails between Gov. Mark Sanford and “Maria, a woman in Buenos Aires, Argentina.”
The newspaper promises that the full e-mail exchange will be published in tomorrow’s edition. But the excerpts released so far include these details:
From Maria, 7/9/08:
“… You are my love … something hard to believe even for myself as it’s also a kind of impossible love, not only because of distance but situation. Sometimes you don’t choose things, they just happen… I can’t redirect my feelings and I am very happy with mine towards you.”
From Gov. Sanford, 7/10/08:
“… have been asked to spend it out in Aspen, Colorado with McCain – which has kicked up the whole VP talk all over again in the press back home… I could digress and say that you have the ability to give magnificent gentle kisses, or that I love your tan lines or that I love the curve of your hips, the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night’s light – but hey, that would be going into sexual details …”
OK, this is voyeuristic and sick.
There is no need for this level of detail to be made public.
flap Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
Yep, this is disgusting. I think Sanford should resign. But, I’m sure he won’t.
flap Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 9:45 pm
An aside…are politicians idiots? If you’re having an affair, are you stupid enough to think that e-mails won’t get out? They’re EXTREMELY easy to copy, save, etc. It’s pathetic. I guess that’s the only way the Guv could talk to his honey, though.
Phone calls can be taped, too…so you can only talk in person or in Morse code.
Kregg Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 11:27 pm
Flap said: They’re EXTREMELY easy to copy, save, etc.
K: Who would have access to the emails other than Sanford and his girlfriend?
Um Cara Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 11:33 pm
South Carolina’s The State newspaper, for one.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 12:08 am
Um said: South Carolina’s The State newspaper, for one.
K: No kidding… ;-) But how does a newspaper gain access to emails that are otherwise private? Who intercepted, copied, etc… these emails so that they could be published?
Um Cara Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 12:22 am
Good question, actually.
The woman scorned?
Probably not though… She probably doesn’t want the world to know what a cheeseball she married.
At any rate, I really don’t think this should be in the public domain, he has admitted to the affair – what purpose (other than titillation) does publishing these private emails serve?
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 12:30 am
Um said; At any rate, I really don’t think this should be in the public domain, he has admitted to the affair – what purpose (other than titillation) does publishing these private emails serve?
K: It will serve the bottom feeders for several days, I’m sure. Alan’s site seems to be holding a feast as we speak…
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Awwwww. Isn’t that cute? Kregg is upset because we’re calling out the hypocracy of his republican friends. Dry your tears, Kregg. We let you bottom feeders have a feast when Blagojevich was outed.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 11:32 am
TD said: Awwwww. Isn’t that cute? Kregg is upset because we’re calling out the hypocracy of his republican friends.
K: It amazes me how you can so consistently miss a point, TD. No one needs to indulge themselves in the intimate private details of this man’s relationship with his girlfriend and they certainly need not be published in the newspaper.
TD: Dry your tears, Kregg. We let you bottom feeders have a feast when Blagojevich was outed.
K: What was Blago outed for? BTW, I think he’s innocent and will proven so.
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 1:31 pm
K: “No one needs to indulge themselves in the intimate private details…”
TD: Hey! I didn’t put those e-mail out there, but since they are, we’re gonna comment on them. You know, just like you did with the Clinton BJ scandal.
K: “What was Blago outed for? BTW, I think he’s innocent and will proven so.”
TD: How quickly you forget his scandal.
RDM Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
TDro319
What if there were no hypothetical questions?
Hope for Change Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Any emails sent on state computers are subject to FOI release. There is no distinction between public and private emails if sent through government computers. Why else did the Bush adminstration use private email accounts so often for business?
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 10:15 am
K prv: “What was Blago outed for? BTW, I think he’s innocent and will proven so.”
TD said: How quickly you forget his scandal.
K: groan…..
GuidoVanHorn Reply:
June 28th, 2009 at 2:17 am
Why else did the Bush adminstration use private email accounts so often for business?
—
actually all of the presidents e-mails from private accounts are in legal limbo, GWB discontinued the use of his private e-mail upon taking office, just in case.
TDro319 Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 10:10 pm
Oh yeah. After reading Sanford’s e-mails to his mistress, I can just tell how much he loves his wife.
Yep. Gotta love those republican “moral family values”.
Danielle Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 10:13 pm
You got it – gotta love those hypocritical “family value conservatives”!
average james Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 11:11 pm
That is the most distressing part of it.
So much holy gum flapping.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
TD said: Yep. Gotta love those republican “moral family values”.
K: Just because a guy fails to follow ‘moral family values’ does not mean that there’s anything wrong with ‘moral family values”.
Danielle Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 12:25 am
I agree, there is nothing wrong with “moral family values”. But many conservatives are constantly walking around with halos over their head, implying that they’re so much more moral than the rest of us….turns out they’re often times the most immoral of us all!!!!!!
But hey…maybe we should be grateful he abandoned his family, abandoned his position of being governor of an entire state, and fly to Argentina to go visit his whore. I could be worse…he could have been soliciting gay male sex in public airport restrooms, texting sexual inappropriately comments to young boys or standing in front of the church preaching about the evils of homosexuality although afterwards that same preacher is caught buying meth with his gay prostitute lover.
Um Cara Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 12:44 am
and fly to Argentina to go visit his whore.
The denigration of this woman is really disgusting.
You know nothing about her, nothing about what lies he may have told her, yet you sit back and label her a ‘whore’.
Shame on you.
EricG Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
“There is no need for this level of detail to be made public.”
Write to FOX News and other media agencies and tell them you feel as such. I personally don’t care. He is a Gov and subject to such things. If these were private emails of just some random person, then it has no business being public.
Inquiring minds want to know and the freedom of press should give it to them.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
At least he wasn’t harassing underage boys, like other Republicans do.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:14 am
Jasper said: At least he wasn’t harassing underage boys, like other Republicans do.
K: Nor was he leaving semen stains on the little blue dresses of 22 year old interns under the desk in the Oval Office…
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 10:53 am
K: “Nor was he leaving semen stains on the little blue dresses of 22 year old interns under the desk in the Oval Office…”
TD: …Or picking up underage kids on the internet.
EricG Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
“K: Nor was he leaving semen stains on the little blue dresses of 22 year old interns under the desk in the Oval Office…”
For some people … it’s still the 90’s.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
The Eric said: For some people … it’s still the 90’s.
K: And, for others, facts dissolve with time…
EricG Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
I never defended Clinton. My position is that he should not have been impeached but his actions were disrespectful and disgusting.
In my mind, the word ‘facts’ means nothing to people who accept the media-spin surrounding FOX News type media.
If I were to talk about ‘facts dissolving’ that would have to be the Republicans and taking responsibility for the economic crash and CIA torture.
Wait … I forgot … only one party has anything to do with honesty and truthfulness. And it ain’t the Republicans.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
The Eric said: I never defended Clinton. My position is that he should not have been impeached but his actions were disrespectful and disgusting.
K: Not to mention ‘criminal’…
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:15 pm
K: “Not to mention ‘criminal’…”
TD: Tell me again, Kregg…. How many people died because Clinton lied? I can tell you how many people died under Dubya.
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:44 pm
K: “Not to mention ‘criminal’…”
TD: Remind me again Kregg. How many people died because Clinton lied?
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 10:18 am
TD said: Remind me again Kregg. How many people died because Clinton lied?
K: Is this your standard for prosecution of the perjury laws, TD?
TDro319 Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
K: “Is this your standard for prosecution of the perjury laws, TD?”
TD: No, but you seem so intent on defending Bush for attacking Iraq based on lies, but have no problem going after Clinton for a BJ.
I ask you again, how many people died because Clinton lied? I can tell you how many people (approximately) died because Bush lied.
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
K prv: “Is this your standard for prosecution of the perjury laws, TD?”
TD: No, but you seem so intent on defending Bush for attacking Iraq based on lies, but have no problem going after Clinton for a BJ.
K: No, once again s l o w l y – Clinton perjured himself. That means he lied in court. Here, I’ve done the hard work of looking the term up in the dictionary: “Perjury – the offense of willfully telling an untruth in a court after having taken an oath or affirmation.”
K: TD, THIS is why Clinton was impeached – NOT because he was diddling interns under the desk in the oval office. Got it?
TD: I ask you again, how many people died because Clinton lied? I can tell you how many people (approximately) died because Bush lied.
K: sigh….
TDro319 Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
K: I’m familiar with the definition of perjury. Now if you think being impeached because he lied about sex with an intern is cause for impeachment, there’s definitely something wrong with your perception of values.
Since you have trouble understanding, I’ll lay it out for you:
Clinton – people who died because he lied: 0
Bush/Cheney – people who died because he lied the U.S. into an unnecessary war: 4000+ American soldiers and 100,000+ Iraqi citizens.
Sorry, I’ll take Clinton’s BJ over Bush’s slaughter anyday.
Danielle Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 12:30 am
Kregg,
There is NO comparison over 2 adults having consensual sex (although inappropriate), to an adult texting CHILDREN sexually suggestive comments. Come on……
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 12:56 am
Danielle said: There is NO comparison over 2 adults having consensual sex (although inappropriate), to an adult texting CHILDREN sexually suggestive comments. Come on……
K: Huh? To the best of my recollection I’ve made no comments at all about ‘adults texting CHILDREN sexually suggestive comments. What are you talking about?
GuidoVanHorn Reply:
June 28th, 2009 at 2:19 am
Foley…
which is strange unto itself…both circumstances are bad…but I’m going to have to go with infidelity as worse than a text message by just a shade…
June 24th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
The funny thing is he should resign not over this affair but over the horrible job he’s done as governor of S.C.
Danielle Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
Agreed, the bigger issue is nobody knowing the whereabouts of the governor of a state – talk about incompetency!
In addition, he should be asked to step down just based on the fact of sheer stupidity! It didn’t cross his mind one time that this e-mail could be discovered!?!?!?
inaisle8 Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 10:28 pm
Danielle is correct.
I believe his biggest offense was that he left the state for six days and no one really knew where he was.
That action was totally irresponsible to the security and welfare of the South Carolina state citizens.
As a sitting governor this type of behavior is not normal or rational.
I hope the next time he decides to disappear without a trace… that it’s just part of his new career as a magician.
Markie the Magnificent
ABRACADABRA
June 24th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
“…the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night’s light…”
Okay, just a wild guess but probably that’s a girl.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:16 am
Rocky said: Okay, just a wild guess but probably that’s a girl.
K: Crackerjack mind ya’ got goin’ there Rock.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Fo news ask for forgiveness for the two” Family Values” senators.
Sean stays silence
O’reilly declares the culture war suspended
Greta will not take a trip to Argentina
No more outrage from Foxy news, please!
inaisle8 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 6:57 am
Now there’s three scary Fox News stooges.
Not unlike the three Fox & Frumps in the a.m.
Smirking weather guy
Token air head blonde
Baby Huey
EricG Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Of course the media hounds are staying quiet. They know all too well how totally full of carp their party is. It’s all a game of hiding the truth.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
“… you have the ability to give magnificent gentle kisses … I love your tan lines … I love the curve of your hips, the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night’s light …”
Sanford is no great shakes as a writer. I’m almost certain he stole these lines from a Harlequin romance novel. Argentine women must be easy to fool. I’m almost expecting Fabio to jump off the page at me.
And, just what are these “two magnificent parts of yourself” she’s holding on to? I want pictures!!
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:18 am
Anonymouse said: And, just what are these “two magnificent parts of yourself” she’s holding on to? I want pictures!!
K: No sex life of your own, huh, ‘mouse?
anonymouse Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:29 am
I’m only curious as to what these two magnificent parts are. That’s all.
Ears? Toes? Nostrils? Thumbs? Arms? Feet?
Maria was holding her two magnificent toes in the faded glow of the night’s light.
Nah, that ain’t doin’ nothin’ for me.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:33 am
‘mouse said: Nah, that ain’t doin’ nothin’ for me.
K: Ah, lifer huh?
June 24th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Personally, after reading the e-mails Sanford sent to his mistress, I think his wife should divorce him and take him to the cleaners.
flap Reply:
June 24th, 2009 at 10:32 pm
But TDro, Sanford disappearing and shirking his duties as governor and admitting to an affair are “just about sex” like with Bill Clinton! Are you people going to go after him about sex?
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:18 am
Oops…
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 10:59 am
Flap:
Oh come on! Did you read those e-mails? Do you think his wife doesn’t know about them? Give me a break. If I were her and read something like the following, I’d divorce him immediately and take him to the cleaners.
“..I could digress and say that you have the ability to give magnificent gentle kisses, or that I love your tan lines or that I love the curve of your hips, the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night’s light – but hey, that would be going into sexual details …”
BTW, I don’t think Clinton said anything like that to Monica. And if he did, we don’t know about them.
flap Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
TDro, I’m with you on Sanford…those e-mails are horrible.
I just think there should have been the same outrage from the left for Clinton’s affair with Monica. He was President.
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
Flap:
I’m not outraged that Sanford had an affair. Quite frankly I really don’t care. What bothers me is his blatant hypocracy. He’s so quick to point out the faults of others, yet fails to take no notice of his own.
Same with Clinton. I don’t care that he had an affair. Now if he spent every waking moment vilifying the republicans for their immoral behavior while at the same time having an affair himself, I would have been extremely displeased at his hypocracy.
flap Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
So you only care about hypocrisy, not infidelity? Aren’t they both types of bad or immoral behavior?
inaisle8 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
Most of the guys I knew thought Clinton was a cool dude and gave him the thumbs up or pass for his adventures with the ladies.
and.. he did have a lot of groupies.
Mark Sanford is just a doofus who left his state and its citizens high and dry for the wilds of the pampas bush.
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 10:25 am
TD said: Same with Clinton. I don’t care that he had an affair. Now if he spent every waking moment vilifying the republicans for their immoral behavior while at the same time having an affair himself, I would have been extremely displeased at his hypocracy.
K: With this I agree – in part. While I DO care whether or not my public servants uphold the most basic of laws – fidelity to their marriage – it is extremely hypocritical of any person to publicly make moralistic remarks about another while practicing the same immoral behavior. Having said that we need to find out whether Sanford was having an affair at the time of his remarks about Clinton to determine whether or not he was acting hypocritical at the time. We can judge his current hypocrisy by whether or not he subjects himself to the same standard he set for Clinton – stepping down from public office.
average james Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 10:58 am
Flap asked,
‘So you only care about hypocricy, not infidelity?’
Both are bad. One is bad twice.
Robbery is bad. Robbery with assault is worse.
TDro319 Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
K: “we need to find out whether Sanford was having an affair at the time of his remarks about Clinton to determine whether or not he was acting hypocritical at the time.”
TD: So basically it’s okay that Sanford called out Clinton on his immoral behavior back then because he said it BEFORE he started his own affair? Give me a break!
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
TD: So basically it’s okay that Sanford called out Clinton on his immoral behavior back then because he said it BEFORE he started his own affair? Give me a break!
K: Again, sigh…. Pay attention, TD. If Sanford was NOT having an affair when he criticized Clinton he was NOT a hypocrite, was he? Again, I’ll do your heavy lifting and look up the term for you: “Hypocrisy – the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own behavior does not conform;’. Now, if his behavior DID conform to his beliefs at the time he castigated Clinton he wasn’t a hypocrite at the time – was he? He has NOW become a hypocrite IMO for not voluntarily stepping down from the office of governor because NOW his actions do not corrospond to his stated morals back then.
TDro319 Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
K: Well thank God I have Kregg to lecture me on who’s hypocritical and who’s not. On who’s right and who’s wrong.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I don’t want to be late for Gingrich’s lecture on family values and Turdblossom’s lecture on political ethics.
June 24th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
“… or two magnificent parts of yourself in the faded glow of the night’s light …”
I’d still like a further explanation of this. What two “magnificent parts” are we talking about and do they have anything to do with “tan lines”?
Hubba, hubba.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:19 am
Buy a magazine, its not as taxing…
June 25th, 2009 at 1:19 am
Don’t cry for me Argentina
The truth is I never left you
All through my wild days
My mad existence
I kept my promise
Don’t keep your distance
And as for fortune, and as for fame
I never invited them in
Though it seemed to the world they were all I desired
They are illusions
They are not the solutions they promised to be
The answer was here all the time
I love you and hope you love me
Don’t cry for me Argentina
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrx5Ve7y0xM
jazmine Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:07 am
It’s a great song, sung by a great artist (in my opinion) But the story of Eva Peron, is what fascinates me. History and a great love story. Thanks for posting it :)
anonymouse Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:24 am
Yep, a great song and a great performance.
anonymouse Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:33 am
From the Youtube comments …
Buenos Aires, June 23, 2009
Maria: Don’t cry for me, Governor Sanford
Mark: Waah!!!
Maria: The truth is I never loved you.
Mark: Waah!!!
Maria All through our wild days, our mad existence
Mark: Waah!!!
Maria: I kept my promise, so keep your distance.
Mark: Waah!!!
Maria: Adios senor, go back to your wife and kids.
Mark: Waaaaaaaaaah!!!
That made me laugh and spit up my pepsi!!
jazmine Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:41 am
Typical guy response! I’m not surprised.They never listen. Waah!!!
June 25th, 2009 at 1:46 am
You sickies through masturbating over Sanford’s emails yet?
jazmine Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:21 am
No:)
jazmine Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:37 am
Now I am :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))). Thanks!
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Quickie, huh? ;-)
jazmine Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 12:24 am
Yup!Thanks for noticing Kregg ;)
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:18 am
Always glad to help… ;-)
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 11:02 am
Kregg said, “You sickies through masturbating over Sanford’s emails yet?”
Are you through masterbating over Clinton’s BJ yet? After all, it’s been over 10 years – time to stop choking the chicken.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 11:16 am
What is ‘masterbating’?
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
K: “What is ‘masterbating’?”
TD: In my haste, I misspelled the word “masturbating”. But of course since you’re infallible, you wouldn’t know what a mistake is.
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
TD: In my haste, I misspelled the word “masturbating”. But of course since you’re infallible, you wouldn’t know what a mistake is.
K: Ya’ never know on this board so I thought it prudent to find out first before responding. Actually, I never was aroused over Clinton’s sexual relations with post-pubescent interns in the oval office, but thanks for asking.
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
K: ” I never was aroused over Clinton’s sexual relations with post-pubescent interns in the oval office”
TD: Is that why you can’t seem to stop talking about it?
EricG Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Are you done masturbating to Ronald Reagan’s picture yet?
Kregg Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 2:06 pm
The Eric said: Are you done masturbating to Ronald Reagan’s picture yet?
K: Why, you want it next?
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
K: “Why, you want it next?”
TD: Don’t worry Kregg. Nobody’s gonna take your Ronald “Bonze Goes to College” Reagan picture away.
June 25th, 2009 at 2:07 am
1. doubtful published in sc newspaper..they cant read.
2. do any of u all braniacs know where argentina even is?
3. she did it for the green card
4. what do expect when your college university team mascot is..”GO COCKS!!!”
Only joel would dig up this spanish novella smut…Well done!!!!
~”dangerous” Suzanne.
Um Cara Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 8:34 am
2. do any of u all braniacs know where argentina even is?
The deep south of Mexico, right?
3. she did it for the green card
You are a racist idiot.
June 25th, 2009 at 5:37 am
I’s rate his game at about 8 of 10. Maybe a 7.
June 25th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Hey Joel, you and Alan really do enjoy gutter journalism don’t you. That is exactly what this post is. Gutter Journalism. Plain and simple. It is not news.
inaisle8 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
I believe it’s called Reality journalism.
Most people slow down and look at the car wreck no matter how awful it may be.
Get real, people love this sort of stuff.
goliath43 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
No
I believe its called Gutter Journalism perpetuated By Joel and Alan.
No.. to some of us its just plain trash. Not one bit of this is news worthty. It’s on the same level as National Enquirer and the like.
inaisle8 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
One mans trash is another mans gold.
goliath43 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
You’re right…lol
TDro319 Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
“Hey Joel, you and Alan really do enjoy gutter journalism don’t you. That is exactly what this post is. Gutter Journalism. Plain and simple. It is not news.”
Hey Daddio, there’s a good remedy for that – don’t post here. See how simple that is? Besides, it’ll keep your blood pressure down.
June 25th, 2009 at 3:45 pm
This is at once shameful and hilarious. The only party in this madness that I have any sympathy for is Mrs. Sanford and any applicable children they share.
I am GLAD this man’s love notes have been spread around for America to read. Talkin’ about gentle kisses with his Latin Lover when he should’ve been at marriage counseling.
June 25th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
UmCara…
Heres a quarter. Go buy yourself a sense of humor.
Um Cara Reply:
June 25th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Thanks for the quarter, can’t spend it here – but I’ll save it for next time I visit the states.
Ok, let’s try this ‘humor’ thing of yours…
3. she did it for the green card
Huahuahua… another person accusing this Argentinian woman of being a whore… huahuahua
Hmmm… I have to admit, I still don’t find it amusing. Having lived in South America for a few years now, the whole gringos assuming / joking that all chicks in South America are prostitutes just seems to have lost it’s comic value.
I find the ignorance a bit pathetic, actually.
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 1:31 am
Um said: I find the ignorance a bit pathetic, actually.
K: Those comments aren’t out of ignorance, Um, but from just plain ol’ stupid-ass meanness.
Um Cara Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 1:35 am
Those comments aren’t out of ignorance, Um, but from just plain ol’ stupid-ass meanness.
It’s a mix, for sure. I’ll comment on it further tomorrow, a few things on the topic I’d like to say – but I’m going to bed.
Boa noite
June 25th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
sanfords 17 year old son should kick his ass
Kregg Reply:
June 26th, 2009 at 1:46 am
Sharky said: sanfords 17 year old son should kick his ass
K: Maybe John Edward’s three – oops, four – kids can show him how
June 26th, 2009 at 1:24 am
Um said: Hmmm… Having lived in South America for a few years now, the whole gringos assuming / joking that all chicks in South America are prostitutes just seems to have lost it’s comic value.
K: Here is a description of Sanford’s Argentinian ‘whore’ who ‘did it for the green card’ (according to some on this board):
From Fox news:
The athletic brunette at the center of a media firestorm following South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford’s confession of an affair is a 43-year old Buenos Aires resident who lives in an upscale apartment building, FOXNews.com has confirmed.
Her name is Maria Belen Chapur, and local media in Argentina have identified her as Sanford’s mistress.
She lives in a 14-story apartment building next to the Buenos Aires Zoo, in a trendy neighborhood that is also near the U.S. Embassy.
A witness who works in the building described her to Buenos Aires Continental Radio as a beautiful brunette with big eyes who plays tennis on a nearby lawn and runs every morning in her neighborhood.
Terra Noticias reported that Chapur speaks several languages, including English, Portuguese and Chinese. It reported that Chapur works for Bunge y Born, but a representative for the agribusiness firm told FOXNews.com that is incorrect.
June 26th, 2009 at 1:29 am
[...] emails Mark Sanford sent to his Latin lover have special meaning when performed Karaoke-style by the audience at the Jimmy Fallon [...]
June 27th, 2009 at 2:30 pm