Maria Belen Chapur Speaks
The woman with whom South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford had an affair speaks like an aggrieved party because of “certain incorrect things that are being spread worldwide” and causing “great pain to me…my two children, my family….” Among other things, she writes:
1. I won’t speak about my private life as it just belongs to me. It has already been made too public during these last days, bringing to me even more pain.
Yes, that can happen when you have an affair with a married United States governor.









Yes, that can happen when you have an affair with a married United States governor.
Especially considering it’s populace has an insatiable appetite for base voyeuristic stimulation, and a media all too anxious to provide it (yea, you are part of the problem, Alan).
anonymouse Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 2:18 am
Rather than complain about the attention, you’re supposed to “deflect” it back to past/current Dem misdeeds instead.
See “Posted by JaredfromTexas, June 29th, 2009 at 12:45 am” below for a good example of how it’s to be done.
“Sanford? No, the Dem Edwards made a sex tape so he’s worse!!”
JaredfromTexas Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Deflection…yes indeed…
See ANON’s post at 2:24am
Hmmm. Stealing a baseball collection from a dead kid. Classy. Bad karma, too.
Seems there’s a lot of people getting pretty good at this tactic, yes?
CherylCarroll Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
wheres this sex tape and why hasn’t mr. voyeur colmes posted it? id love to see it. honestly. edwards is hot.
are we supposed 2 feel sorry that the world now knows what maria n sanford already knew- that he was betraying his wife n she was a willing participant? sorry, lady. i dont care abt ur feelings bc u didnt care abt his wife’s.u knew that spoon was sposed 2be stirring another pot.
June 29th, 2009 at 12:40 am
so sad:
Report: Ex-Aid Claims John Edwards Made Sex Tape With Mistress
crap…I just fell into the voyeuristic stimulation trap…
anonymouse Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 2:24 am
… “Elizabeth [Edwards] also suspects [ex-aid] Young stole the baseball card collection of her late son, Wade” …
Hmmm. Stealing a baseball collection from a dead kid. Classy. Bad karma, too.
June 29th, 2009 at 12:45 am
Hey, for once a radical rightwing republikkkan rumor coming from a source with a speck more credibility than the NY Post: a book proposal submitted to St. Martin’s Press.
You know St. Martin’s. They publish Jackie Collins.
Woooooo…..
GuidoVanHorn Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 1:39 am
no I didn’t know St. Martin’s publishes Jackie Collins… I usually stick with more refined books…like Spiderman.
June 29th, 2009 at 1:37 am
“A man can receive nothing, unless it has been given him from heaven” (John 3:27).
Everything in life is a gift from God.
And, oh baby!! Finally a picture and, even though it’s not a good photo, Maria sure appears to be a “gift from God” to my eye.
Maybe there’s something to this religious stuff after all. Is it too late for me to jump on this train?
Kregg Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 3:19 am
Mouse said: Maybe there’s something to this religious stuff after all. Is it too late for me to jump on this train?
K: Only when you have the right attitude… ;-)
June 29th, 2009 at 1:50 am
Now that we have a photo of the lady, the facts are obvious.
Sanford was only traveling to Argentina for a religious experience.
Living in an apartment though, let’s hope they didn’t wake the neighbors. I hate it when that happens.
June 29th, 2009 at 1:57 am
lol, me too!
anonymouse Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 2:46 am
Sanford/Maria: Oh, MY GOD!! Oh, MY GOD!! Oh, MY GOD!! Praise the LORD!!
Downstairs neighbor: Hey!! Knock it off up there!! Some of us have to go to work tomorrow!!
June 29th, 2009 at 2:20 am
Other than the recent shocking heterosexual trend of Family Values Republicans, isn’t the real issue WHY our American Ho’s aren’t good enough for soon to be ex-Gov Sanford?
David Diapers Vitters is leading the pack in this regard. Don’t get me wrong, he’s total scum but Louisiana doesn’t seem to care. His only current contender is Stormy Daniels an Honest Sex Worker and Movie Producer who has the high ground but is a long shot.
JaredfromTexas Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 3:57 am
4MORE,
Sometime you surprise me with your vitriol. How ’bout the recent shocking heterosexual trend of Family Values Democrats?
EVERYONE who is married espouses family values…neither party can claim ownership of a person’s own value system…which is why I’ve questioned the right’s propensity to run on this platform…
That being said…is a Republican who affirms his/her beliefs in front of the nation more of a hypocrite than a Dem who does the same in front of wedding guests…both of whom are guilty of infidelity?
TDro319 Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:27 pm
“Sometime you surprise me with your vitriol. How ’bout the recent shocking heterosexual trend of Family Values Democrats?”
The democrats didn’t run on the “family values” ticket. Now if Edwards vilified Sanford for his adulterous affair while being involved in one himself at the same time, I would call him out on it.
And I love your “Oh yeah? What about the democrats” response. I almost look forward to your childish rants. Almost.
JaredfromTexas Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:41 pm
TDRO,
I never said Dems ran on the family values ticket…and most republicans don’t either. It’s just a misnomer the Republican party is the “family values” party
And I love your “Oh yeah? What about the democrats” response
That’s funny because I employ the exact same debate tactic you employ…only replace “democrats” with “republicans” and “Bush/Cheney” and “two unneccessary wars”…
June 29th, 2009 at 3:37 am
blah blah blah Jared. The point is WHAT is wrong with our American Ho’s?
June 29th, 2009 at 4:07 am
Ha! Jared, I SURPRISE you with my Vitriol.
Did you know that George W Bush allegedly used his family’s connections to leap to the head of the line so that he could DEFEND Texas in the Texas Air National Guard (and stay out of Vietnam), and then when he could no longer pass a blood test allegedly went awol?
“Is our Children Learning”?
JaredfromTexas Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 4:16 am
4MORE,
Did YOU know that Bill Clinton was a draft dodger?
How many more irrelevant statements do you want to make?
“Is YOU learnin’?”
June 29th, 2009 at 4:13 am
Well Jared,
I learned a LONG time ago that Dick, “they will welcome us with flowers”, Cheney WAS the biggest draft dodger of all (FOUR (4?) deferrments?) and sent the most young kidz to their deaths along with the rest of the SissyHawk Bush2 cabinet, oops no WMD’s…sorry!
On the bright side the Necons proved the FAIL of the Neocon Domino Democracy Middle East Theory:) Isn’t that GREAT kidz?
Jared, You got Fire Ants in your ears down there boy?
“blah blah blah Jared. The point is WHAT is wrong with our American Ho’s?” (night:)
TDro319 Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
4MoreYears:
Let’s not forget Dick Cheney’s 5 Vietnam deferments. Seems he had better things to do at the time than to serve his country, but anxiously sent our young off to die in an unnecessary war for his profit.
TDro319 Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
4MoreYears:
I heard Cheney had 5 VietNam deferments. Seems he had better things to do at the time than to serve his country. Interesting how he was so anxious to send our young off to die in an unnecessary war for his profit.
blissfulconservative Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Did Obama serve? Clinton?
TDro319 Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
BC: “Did Obama serve? Clinton?”
TD: The draft was abolished before Obama would have been old enough to serve. Therefore he did not look for excuses to avoid serving. As for Clinton, I have no excuse except that he was a great republican.
June 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
wow , what a piece of work. She isnt that pretty anyway.
GuidoVanHorn Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 7:24 am
well y’know she has two legs and breasts…so that’s about as far as the male mind gets.
JaredfromTexas Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 8:20 am
Get out of my head, GUIDO!!!!
;)
Suzanne Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 5:46 am
lol@boys….
GuidoVanHorn Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 7:40 am
Suzanne,
sorry if your pic is of some famous person I don’t know about…but is your pic you?
June 29th, 2009 at 6:41 am
Other than the recent shocking heterosexual trend of Family Values Republicans, isn’t the real issue WHY our American Ho’s aren’t good enough for soon to be ex-Gov Sanford?
There is no indication that Sanford likes ‘Ho’s’ of any sort, American or not.
June 29th, 2009 at 9:22 am
wow , what a piece of work. She isnt that pretty anyway.
Sure she is. She isn’t a kid, and this isn’t a ridiculous glamor photo (like some folks put on their facebook accounts, for example), but she is a very attractive woman.
Suzanne Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 5:48 am
no she isnt. But probably not as pretty as you or your black heart Umcara..
Um Cara Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 7:24 am
But probably not as pretty as you or your black heart Umcara.
LOL, don’t hate me because I’m beautiful.
June 29th, 2009 at 9:24 am
Guido!
Shut up! Us conservative males often think like that but we don’t say it in public – it’s against the rules :-)
Really, you folks are right; when you make a series of bad decisions there are consequences. I can empathize with Ms Chapur because I don’t like the consequences to my bad decisions, but she needs to face the music.
BTW, Um Cara, I am working on a “deflection” piece that Barack took AF One to Area 51 and had sex with extra-terrestrials. I just made it up, but the Democrat and Republican jackasses in congress can assemble a congressional investigation and deflect people from looking into their slovenly conduct. Think it’ll work?
TDro319 Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Why not? It worked for the republicans in the Clinton/Lewinsky case.
June 29th, 2009 at 9:28 am
The woman with whom South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford had an affair speaks like an aggrieved party
She was an aggrieved party, somebody hacked into her email and released it to the press. I too would feel like an aggrieved party.
The vast majority of this statement was made to correct the record with regards to who leaked the emails. Apparently a friend of hers had been accused of doing it, and she was trying to clear her friend’s name in the matter.
She says she knows who did it, but cannot prove it legally, and will thus not reveal the name.
June 29th, 2009 at 9:32 am
“…speaks like an aggrieved party…”
Traditionally, the other woman always thinks that she and the husband are both aggrieved parties. It’s called rationalizing.
And, well, I guess she’s better looking than Palin.
Budda Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:12 am
She’s not a ‘victim’; she cheated on her husband and boonked a married man. Similar to robbing a bank and getting caught..you are NOT the victim. (I know bank robbery and adultry aren’t a real good comparison, but you do get the point.)
Um Cara Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Her private email account was hacked and her private emails were disseminated to the press. She is a victim of that theft.
Regarding the affair, she is as guilty a party as he, certainly.
Budda Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 1:16 pm
If there was no affair, her hacked e-mail would be no-big-deal…and no one would even know it (the hacked e-mail) happened. She is NOT the victim here.
Um Cara Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
If there was no affair, her hacked e-mail would be no-big-deal…and no one would even know it (the hacked e-mail) happened. She is NOT the victim here.
Seriously? The ‘if you didn’t have anything to hide you wouldn’t mind people reading and sending your private emails to the press’ defense? Do you have a password on your email account? Why? Do you have something to hide?
As said, she is absolutely equally culpable in the affair, but her private emails should never have been released to the public.
And those in the media who have printed them (including Alan) should be ashamed of themselves. Not the media’s proudest hour.
blissfulconservative Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 3:05 pm
The same people who don’t have a problem with her private emails being made public without her consent are the same people who didn’t see a problem with Palin’s private emails being hacked.
TDro319 Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm
UmCara:
When people become celebrities, they should expect their personal life to be exposed. I’m not saying it’s right. It’s just a fact of life.
Um Cara Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:51 pm
I’m not saying it’s right. It’s just a fact of life.
There are many ‘facts of life’ that aren’t right, which I speak out against.
With regards to Señora Chapur:
- she has been labeled a whore
- she has been accused of ‘being after a green card’
- her private correspondence has been stolen and published
All of that is disgusting, and in my opinion, right thinking people should speak out against it rather than participate, or excuse it.
She and the Governor were apparently involved in an apparently sincere love affair, one which should not have started. They definitely failed morally with regards to the infidelity, something more than half of Americans have also done.
That in no way excuses the bizarre fascination with the very personal details of the affair that the American people have. The governor has encouraged this with his freaky too much information press conferences. Señora Chapur, by contrast, has been far more dignified – and has only spoken out once – and then it was primarily to speak against rumors that a friend of hers had released the emails.
flap Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:52 pm
“And, well, I guess she’s better looking than Palin.”
Don’t you EVER insult Sarah’s looks! I will defend her honor, you know.
June 29th, 2009 at 10:51 am
You mean the same people who were ok with the federal goverment to monitor e-mails and phone calls of who ever they wanted to with out a warrant??? BTW on a side note just imagine that Mark Sanford was a black man . Same circumctances, Sen. of SC. the whole cheating incident, don’t you think he would be getting more pressure to resign??
blissfulconservative Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Only if he were a republican and the cries were from democrats.
BTW, just imagine that sotomayor were a white man when she made those remarks about being a latina. Don’t you think she’d be getting pressure from the left NOT to be confirmed?
June 29th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
Well, I guess the Pentagon Papers shouldn’t have been published either. The point is the bigger picture which does involve a Governor of the Family Values Party having an affair. No,hacking someones e-mail or mail or other ‘private’ correspondence is wrong, even illegal in most instances. But, I repeat, she is NOT a victim in this sordid affair, just a participant.
Um Cara Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 7:50 pm
Well, I guess the Pentagon Papers shouldn’t have been published either.
You are going to compare these love letters to the Pentagon Papers?
But, I repeat, she is NOT a victim in this sordid affair, just a participant.
We agree, she is not a victim in the affair. But, I don’t think any public good is served by publishing her private correspondence. It is just another type of pornography.
June 29th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
Is this REALLY Maria Belen Chapur???? Because I’ve seen photos of a VERY Different Looking Woman..Whatever the situation, try to at least put the correct information/ photos, etc. out there.
jazmine Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
What makes you think it’s not her picture? ( Just wiki-google her name) They both work in diplomatic circles. It’s not like he’s going to have this passionate affair with some mountain dwelling weaver. Wouldn’t you agree?
June 29th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
I still can’t get over the fact that this man was basically begging his wife for permission to go screw his whore in Argentina! Who does that? And his wife’s response was “absolutely not”. I would have said, “sure honey, and don’t bother ever coming back – don’t let the door hit you on your a**”. I’ve never hurt a fly; but I swear I think I would have punched him right in the face for asking me such a stupid question!
I mean have you ever heard of anything so stupid!?!? It’s insulting enough to cheat on your spouse, but to have the balls to beg her if you can go have one? How bizarre.
jazmine Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Whore??? Where do get that from? You must be smoking too many reefers girl.
Danielle Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Yeah..that must be it.
jazmine Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 10:56 pm
Cool, it’s agreed then. Thanks:)
blissfulconservative Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:02 pm
Did you call monica that awful name?
And all along I thought you were for two consenting adults doing what made them happy. Hmmm.
Um Cara Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
I still can’t get over the fact that this man was basically begging his wife for permission to go screw his whore in Argentina!
Not him, since she wasn’t ‘his’ nor a ‘whore’.
Danielle Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
What? Um Cara?
jazmine Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:07 pm
Thanks Um Cara, she doesn’t deserve that. Let’s not forget it takes two to tango…
blissfulconservative Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:09 pm
NO she doesn’t deserve it.
4moreyears Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 1:36 am
Amen, Danielle. Um, um Cara?
jazmine Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
Sounds like it’s happened to you? There vengeance coming from you.
Danielle Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 12:03 am
Sorry, but if you’re married and have a family yourself….then…..sleep with a married man with a family (and vice versa for him) – doesn’t exactly make you Mother Theresa.
And no, it’s never happened to me. Just expressing my “family values”…..which ironically seem to be much more moral than the one’s shouting it from the roof-top and ramming it down peoples throat.
jazmine Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 12:39 am
Quite an interesting perspective coming from another women…So, why is she the scapecoat and not him?
jazmine Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 12:52 am
What does Mother Theresa have to do with anything??? like meaning virginal, That’s funny!That ain’t it, sweetheart.
They had adult sex,and for sure we don’t really know that. Let’s say they did, so what? He knew He was married…maybe she didn’t? Does that make one a whore? How slanderise you call my sisterhood…Shame on YOU!
Danielle Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
I never said she was the scapegoat. Both participants are equally responsible for their actions.
June 29th, 2009 at 10:08 pm