Posted by | January 18, 2012 10:41 | Filed under: Top Stories

Buzzfeed sums it up, explaining that the goal may be worthy, but the legislation is too broad:

…aimed at the legitimate goal of protecting original content from outright theft, but written so broadly that they could outlaw much of the last decade’s media revolution. The impulse it acts on basically rejects the startling, wonderful media developments of the last decade, during which journalism — allegedly dead — has been vibrantly reborn.

Like virtually all media companies today, from Fox News and the New York Times to Tumblr and Twitter, BuzzFeed proudly produces our own great original content and pays a large and appropriate monthly fee to the wire services whose photographs we are honored to use. BuzzFeed, like all those companies, also gleefully comments on, shares, and remixes images, words, and ideas. Though SOPA is explicitly aimed at targeting overseas websites that profit from outright piracy, it could wind up placing the burden on publishers to pour resources into policing every image or sentence submitted by a user, and essentially remove entire sites from the Internet when they’re accused of erring.

The legislation could also be a government-provided cudgel in a competitive marketplace. Wikipedia warns: “Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn’t being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won’t show up in major search engines. And, SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression.”

As Wikipedia notes today, “Imagine a world without free knowledge.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2012 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.