Economists Actually Agree
Harry Truman famously remarked that he needed a one-armed economist so that they couldn’t say “on the one hand.” Today, too often we see “economists” quoted on both sides of an issue to make it seem as if there is general disagreement in the economic community. Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers point out that most credentialed economists across the spectrum agree on many things.
In reality, there’s remarkable consensus among mainstream economists, including those from the left and right, on most major macroeconomic issues. The debate in Washington about economic policy is phony. It’s manufactured. And it’s entirely political.
Let’s start with Obama’s stimulus. The standard Republican talking point is that it failed, meaning it didn’t reduce unemployment. Yet in a survey of leading economists conducted by the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, 92 percent agreed that the stimulus succeeded in reducing the jobless rate. On the harder question of whether the benefit exceeded the cost, more than half thought it did, one in three was uncertain, and fewer than one in six disagreed.
Or consider the widely despised bank bailouts. Populist politicians on both sides have taken to pounding the table against them (in many cases, only after voting for them). But while the public may not like them, there’s a striking consensus that they helped: The same survey found no economists willing to dispute the idea that the bailouts lowered unemployment.
So, the next time you hear two sides of an economic issue, don’t bang your head and curse economists (or cut their arms off), see what real economists think.