Pants On Fire
I’m not sure what’s worse, Romney’s lie…
He’s snipped out sentences from an Obama speech and spliced the two halves back together so nobody could tell what he did. Then he did it again to another Obama speech. And he unequivocally said that Obama plans to drop work requirements for welfare even though he’s done nothing of the sort.
…or Gingrich’s defense of it.
Newt’s argument is—and I’m not exaggerating here—that although the Romney ad makes false claims, that’s OK because Barack Obama and those who work for him are, in Newt’s opinion, the kind of people who would gut work requirements if they could, so therefore it’s OK to say that they are actually doing it, even though they aren’t.
Wow, using that standard, imagine what President Obama could say about Romney.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2012 Liberaland