Republicans Vs. Reality (Special Gun Edition)
I’ve written before about Republican distaste for science and math. They tend to oppose these fact-generating disciplines because they lead to policies that they dislike. Arthur Kellerman and Frederick Rivara have a new article in the Journal of the American Medical Association explaining how this has led to defunding of research on gun related homicides (h/t Kevin Drum):
The nation might be in a better position to act if medical and public health researchers had continued to study these issues as diligently as some of us did between 1985 and 1997. But in 1996, pro-gun members of Congress mounted an all-out effort to eliminate the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Although they failed to defund the center, the House of Representatives removed $2.6 million from the CDC’s budget—precisely the amount the agency had spent on firearm injury research the previous year. Funding was restored in joint conference committee, but the money was earmarked for traumatic brain injury. The effect was sharply reduced support for firearm injury research.
To ensure that the CDC and its grantees got the message, the following language was added to the final appropriation: “none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.”
Precisely what was or was not permitted under the clause was unclear. But no federal employee was willing to risk his or her career or the agency’s funding to find out.
If you don’t like what research might find out, just defund the research. And then argue that gun control doesn’t save lives.