Posted by | November 15, 2014 09:30 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Top Stories

With tension already on the rise while waiting for the Grand Jury decision to be handed down in the case of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, the KKK has promised to use “lethal force” against protesters.

That didn’t go down well with Anonymous, so the loosely-knit Internet collective has responded in the best way possible, taking the hoods off of Klan members.

The irony here is palpable.

Anonymous members are masked while ripping the hoods off of Klan members who promise violence against protesters who are exercising their right to free speech.

KKK sites are being DDOSed, faces are exposed and the Klan’s 1-800 number is being trolled.

Watch [UPDATE – YouTube had removed the video due to what they claim is a violation of their policies, but you can’t keep a good video down]:

 

 

Hands up, hoods off.  Faces of the Klan. 

The KKK should have expected them.

Update:

Frank Ancona is officially doxxed, holla!

Send me any new tweets of Klan members being de-hooded and I’ll add them here. Give the Anons some love using the #OpKKK hashtag. 

  • Money

    If the Klans mssion is to subvert and intimidate then they wont prevail. A message to the Klan: You weren’t there so stfu. Ppl in that community was present when Michael Brown was unarmed and gunned down like a effn dog. So if u weren’t there then stfu period! A message to the Gang Bangers: If u use violence to solve this problem then u will become victims as well because force begets force. This is what Michael Brown fell victim to. Don’t make same mistake or your lives and your concerns will be an unfortunate part of this narrative. Dont let Satan beguile you! May God keep and blessu all! I’m praying the strong hold over Ferguson will be destroyed!

  • Money

    If the Klans mssion is to subvert and intimidate then they wont prevail. A message to the Klan: You weren’t there so stfu. Ppl in that community was present when Michael Brown was unarmed and gunned down like a effn dog. So if u weren’t there then stfu period! A message to the Gang Bangers: If u use violence to solve this problem then u will become victims as well because force begets force. This is what Michael Brown fell victim to. Don’t make same mistake or your lives and your concerns will be an unfortunate part of this narrative. Dont let Satan beguile you! May God keep and blessu all! I’m praying the strong hold over Ferguson will be destroyed!

  • John Henry

    With all of the talk about equality, justice, and the war on terror; it takes a hacker group to finally stand up and try to take down the KKK. Amazingly shocking.

    • Greg

      Well, unfortunately (I guess?) the KKK has to break the law to warrant government action. A stupid, ignorant group to be sure though.

      • John Henry

        Not if you are correctly labeled as a terrorist organization. There is a well documented history of the KKK performing the same sorts of acts as any other “terrorist” organization.

        As far as I’m concerned any one still flying the “enemy flag” that was used to rebel and wage war against the legitimate US Government should be investigated for sedition or treason.

        • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

          Exactly. The Klan has broke the law a lot of times from burning religious buildings to terrorizing black people.

          • John Henry

            I know. People are quick to make excuses for racist terrorist until they mess up and hurt another white person. Then they cover it up the fact they the person was from a racist terror group.

            Just like when those racist assassinated the police in the pizza place in vegas. They threw a swastika on the victims before getting killed in Walmart. The major networks left out the swastika part.

            When people wave around the Gadsden flag that says “Don’t Tread On Me”….That is not a warning, that is a threat.

            Today the government talks about “The Lone Wolf” Terrorist supporting ISIS, and we have to Stop them. Well how many more Gadsden Flag waving seditionist must attacked US Government agents,buildings, and citizens before they are also acknowledged as “Lone Wolf” Terrorist.

            • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

              That is a great point Brother.

              The same ones talking about black people in the most vile fashion ignore the white terror that has existed in the Americas from Christopher Columbus to racist terrorist actions in our time.

              Many networks will leave out the swastika. These white racist terrorists are nihilistic, evil, and they should be opposed as you have mentioned. I have seen many vehicles with the “Don’t Thread on Me” signs on them. We know what that means. These seditionists and terrorists have killed our black people, Jewish people, Sikhs, Arabic people, and others from across backgrounds. They have entered government buildings before and they are blatantly cowardly. That is why we should continue to voice the truth and expose these neo-Confederate, racist traitors.

  • John Henry

    With all of the talk about equality, justice, and the war on terror; it takes a hacker group to finally stand up and try to take down the KKK. Amazingly shocking.

    • Greg

      Well, unfortunately (I guess?) the KKK has to break the law to warrant government action. A stupid, ignorant group to be sure though.

      • John Henry

        Not if you are correctly labeled as a terrorist organization. There is a well documented history of the KKK performing the same sorts of acts as any other “terrorist” organization.

        As far as I’m concerned any one still flying the “enemy flag” that was used to rebel and wage war against the legitimate US Government should be investigated for sedition or treason.

        • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

          Exactly. The Klan has broke the law a lot of times from burning religious buildings to terrorizing black people.

          • John Henry

            I know. People are quick to make excuses for racist terrorist until they mess up and hurt another white person. Then they cover up the fact they the person was from a racist terror group.

            Just like when those racist assassinated the police in the pizza place in vegas. They threw a swastika on the victims before getting killed in Walmart. The major networks left out the swastika part.

            When people wave around the Gadsden flag that says “Don’t Tread On Me”….That is not a warning, that is a threat.

            Today the government talks about “The Lone Wolf” Terrorist supporting ISIS, and we have to Stop them. Well how many more Gadsden Flag waving seditionist must attacked US Government agents,buildings, and citizens before they are also acknowledged as “Lone Wolf” Terrorist.

            • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

              That is a great point Brother.

              The same ones talking about black people in the most vile fashion ignore the white terror that has existed in the Americas from Christopher Columbus to racist terrorist actions in our time.

              Many networks will leave out the swastika. These white racist terrorists are nihilistic, evil, and they should be opposed as you have mentioned. I have seen many vehicles with the “Don’t Thread on Me” signs on them. We know what that means. These seditionists and terrorists have killed our black people, Jewish people, Sikhs, Arabic people, and others from across backgrounds. They have entered government buildings before and they are blatantly cowardly. That is why we should continue to voice the truth and expose these neo-Confederate, racist traitors.

  • Dan

    All they did was take screenshots of Twitter accounts related to the initial poster. This is nothing that other people cannot do anybody can do this. its public information that they volunteered on their own accounts

  • Dan

    All they did was take screenshots of Twitter accounts related to the initial poster. This is nothing that other people cannot do anybody can do this. its public information that they volunteered on their own accounts

  • ThePhantomzeus .

    THIS IS MY THING, IF THE COP IS GUILTY THEN HE SHOULDNT BE TREATED ANY DIFFERENT THAN A NORMAL PERSON, BUT DID ANYONE SEE WHAT HAPPENED WHEN RODNEY KING GOT ASSULTED??, RIOTS, NOT LEGAL, PEACEFUL RIOTS, PEOPLE BROKE INTO STORES, BEAT UP INNOCENT PEOPLE, THAT WAS NOT A PEACEFUL PROTEST BY NO MEANS AT ALL. SO I THINK SOME PEOPLE ARE USING THIS THREAT AS A WAY TO GAIN BY STEALING AND HURTING OTHER PEOPLE. IF IM WRONG THEN IM WRONG ,BUT THIS TIME I WOULD LOVE SOMEONE TO PROVE MY STATEMENTS WRONG.

    • The problem is that when things happen, chaos ensues – I’ve watched a few of the livestream videos from people who were down there in Ferguson. What I saw was mostly peaceful protestors being led by Church leaders and such and a few chaos lovers trying to set the place on fire (so to speak).

      All it takes is a few people acting bat-$#it crazy and the media takes it on as being the primary of the protests, saying that it was looters and such.

      But the issue that has me the most concerned is that everyone seems to already know that this Grand Jury is not going to indite the officer who murdered Michael Brown – that the DA didn’t just indite the officer to give him his “day in court” like what officers seem to always tell us when we are charged with a crime. It’s legal trickery to make it look like justice has been served, when really they are protecting the officer from the system that they are supposed to be serving. It’s a way to keep the truth from coming out into the light.

    • Bobby Hill

      Your caps lock is broken.

    • Axekick

      A “normal person”(NORMAL PERSON) would be charged, incarcerated and face a trial. Darren Wilson was paid by the police department while on a leave of absence and scheduled for a grand jury hearing to see if a trial was warranted.

      In a grand jury process the prosecutor controls 100 percent of what evidence is introduced to the jury. Hearsay is permissible and often used. There is no one to counter the evidence introduced so the grand jury functions as a rubber stamp for the prosecutor. Those well connected are commonly protected by the process, anyone else is subjected to being targeted by the grand jury process.

      Comparing this incident to the Rodney King verdict is no more relevant than comparing it to the Emmett Till incident. Neither are relevant.

      • UnderCoverBrother

        No, a normal person would not necessarily be “charged, incarcerated and face trial…” The grand jury can hear as much evidence as it wants. In this case the prosecutor let the grand jury hear it all…or at least what was available. He even subpoenaed Wilson to testify to lock in Wilsons testimony if the grand jury returned an indictment. The grand jury, after considering all the available evidence, decided that there was no reason to try Wilson. That is the way the system works…It is not a matter of being well-connected or not.

        • Axekick

          If you know of anyone who isn’t a politician or police officer and who has shot and killed someone other than on their property and had a grand jury determine if charges were warranted I will admit my error. Otherwise I stand by what I said, a normal person would have been charged, incarcerated and faced trial.

          You obviously have no idea how a grand jury works. They cannot “hear as much evidence as they want,” they hear only what the prosecutor allows them to hear and as much of it as the prosecutor desires.

          The grand jury, after being intentionally confused and overwhelmed with evidence decided there wasn’t enough evidence to warrant charges. This is not how the grand jury system works, not the criminal justice system.
          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-leong/getting-the-facts-right-a_b_6233660.html

          When they asked Bob McCulloch if Michael Brown had shot Darren Wilson would he have sent it to a grand jury his response was “Hell No!”

          • UnderCoverBrother

            No idea how a grand jury works? Only 33 years practicing criminal law…10 as a prosecutor. I see by your HP link that you have a left-wing political agenda and have a reason to complain.

            • Axekick

              10 years as a prosecutor and you think a grand jury can hear as much evidence as it wishes? Hope if I ever get prosecuted, it’s by you.

  • ThePhantomzeus .

    THIS IS MY THING, IF THE COP IS GUILTY THEN HE SHOULDNT BE TREATED ANY DIFFERENT THAN A NORMAL PERSON, BUT DID ANYONE SEE WHAT HAPPENED WHEN RODNEY KING GOT ASSULTED??, RIOTS, NOT LEGAL, PEACEFUL RIOTS, PEOPLE BROKE INTO STORES, BEAT UP INNOCENT PEOPLE, THAT WAS NOT A PEACEFUL PROTEST BY NO MEANS AT ALL. SO I THINK SOME PEOPLE ARE USING THIS THREAT AS A WAY TO GAIN BY STEALING AND HURTING OTHER PEOPLE. IF IM WRONG THEN IM WRONG ,BUT THIS TIME I WOULD LOVE SOMEONE TO PROVE MY STATEMENTS WRONG.

    • greenguy

      The problem is that when things happen, chaos ensues – I’ve watched a few of the livestream videos from people who were down there in Ferguson. What I saw was mostly peaceful protestors being led by Church leaders and such and a few chaos lovers trying to set the place on fire (so to speak).

      All it takes is a few people acting bat-$#it crazy and the media takes it on as being the primary of the protests, saying that it was looters and such.

      But the issue that has me the most concerned is that everyone seems to already know that this Grand Jury is not going to indite the officer who murdered Michael Brown – that the DA didn’t just indite the officer to give him his “day in court” like what officers seem to always tell us when we are charged with a crime. It’s legal trickery to make it look like justice has been served, when really they are protecting the officer from the system that they are supposed to be serving. It’s a way to keep the truth from coming out into the light.

    • Bobby Hill

      Your caps lock is broken.

    • Axekick

      A “normal person”(NORMAL PERSON) would be charged, incarcerated and face a trial. Darren Wilson was paid by the police department while on a leave of absence and scheduled for a grand jury hearing to see if a trial was warranted.

      In a grand jury process the prosecutor controls 100 percent of what evidence is introduced to the jury. Hearsay is permissible and often used. There is no one to counter the evidence introduced so the grand jury functions as a rubber stamp for the prosecutor. Those well connected are commonly protected by the process, anyone else is subjected to being targeted by the grand jury process.

      Comparing this incident to the Rodney King verdict is no more relevant than comparing it to the Emmett Till tragedy. Neither are relevant.

      • UnderCoverBrother

        No, a normal person would not necessarily be “charged, incarcerated and face trial…” The grand jury can hear as much evidence as it wants. In this case the prosecutor let the grand jury hear it all…or at least what was available. He even subpoenaed Wilson to testify to lock in Wilsons testimony if the grand jury returned an indictment. The grand jury, after considering all the available evidence, decided that there was no reason to try Wilson. That is the way the system works…It is not a matter of being well-connected or not.

        • Guest

          If you know of anyone who isn’t a politician or police officer and who has shot and killed someone other than on their property and had a grand jury determine if charges were warranted I will admit my error. Otherwise I stand by what I said, a normal person would have been charged, incarcerated and faced trial.

          You obviously have no idea how a grand jury works. They cannot “hear as much evidence as they want,” they hear only what the prosecutor allows them to hear and as much of it as the prosecutor desires.

          The grand jury, after being intentionally confused and overwhelmed with evidence decided there wasn’t enough evidence to warrant charges. This is not how the grand jury system works, not the criminal justice system.
          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-leong/getting-the-facts-right-a_b_6233660.html

          When they asked Bob McCulloch if Michael Brown had shot Darren Wilson would he have sent it to a grand jury his response was “Hell No!”

          • UnderCoverBrother

            No idea how a grand jury works? Only 33 years practicing criminal law…10 as a prosecutor. I see by your HP link that you have a left-wing political agenda and have a reason to complain.

            • Guest

              10 years as a prosecutor and you think a grand jury can hear as much evidence as it wishes? Hope if I ever get prosecuted, it’s by you.

  • alphamail

    #hoodsoff ^5 Anon

  • alphamail

    #hoodsoff ^5 Anon

  • burqa

    ThePhantonzeus: “THIS IS MY THING

    Bad idea to wave that teeny little thing around in public.
    I hear they make some kind of pump that may help….

  • burqa

    Plenty of the facts came out. There were, what, 3 different autopsies and Eric Holder made sure things were on the up and up, yet even the feds didn’t have a civil rights case.
    Brown was on a crime spree that day. His actions showed an attitude of entitlement to other people’s property and that Brown didn’t feel he had to follow the law. He stole from the store, assaulted the clerk, decided it was ok to walk down the middle of the street, assaulted the cop and refused lawful orders from the cop.
    Eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence all pointed to Brown attacking the cop in his car, fleeing, then Brown came charging back and the cop shot him in self defense.
    The “system” didn’t plant those cigars in Brown’s pocket or the blood stains, either.
    Somehow people got the idea we have to form opinions on such cases immediately. In this case, many were deceived by Brown’s friends who lied. Many formed their opinion based on those lies, namely that Brown was just standing there, reaching for the sky, when the cop walked up and shot him in the back. These same people never altered their opinion when more accurate facts came out.
    Many who rioted likewise believed those lies and ever since, few, if any, seem interested in holding Brown’s friends accountable for the damage their lies caused, much less have I heard any of them admit they lied.
    This is not to say there are no problems with blacks being shot by po-lice when they were no threat to anyone.
    This just isn’t one of those cases.

  • burqa

    I miss “Rowdy Randy”!

    I get a kick out of this like everyone else, but seriously, vigilantism often begins with good intentions but the people in Anonymous are subject to the same temptations and human weaknesses we all are.
    Anonymous has a lot of power here, with no checks and balances and a crowd that believes everything they say is true and doesn’t seem to imagine Anonymous being capable of a mistake that could ruin innocent lives and otherwise cause a lot of harm.

    This will not end well.